User talk:Atrociousrainbow

August 2016

Hello, I'm Krimuk90. An edit that you recently made to Shraddha Kapoor seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Krimuk|90 (talk) 14:10, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Atrociousrainbow. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Atrociousrainbow. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Shraddha Kapoor, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marathi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:12, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Caste

Thank you for this consideration. Caste is an extraordinarily problematic area on Wikipedia, and it is subject to ArbCom discretionary sanctions, which means that if it is perceived that someone is monkeying around with castes or trying to assert A over B, admins can quickly deal with it to prevent problems. I'm not saying that's what you're doing, I'm mentioning this to you just so you're aware it is a very dicey area to be casually editing in. As noted in my edit summary, caste labels require self-identification per longstanding community attitudes at WT:IN. Some folks like Amitabh Bachchan have disavowed caste, so we want to be sure that the individual gets to decide what they are or are not. Kind of like with religion. A newspaper doesn't get to decide what religion you are, that's up to you. In an event where we are not 100% clear that a person is of ___ caste, we should remove the information. Last names don't count, because an Australian could be a Reddy. Thanks for understanding, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:53, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Personal grudge

Not personal grudge but I have a personal crush on her which is why I came to clean up her article, cheers -- Ab207 (talk) 05:05, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please take note

Hi,

Some things you should know:

First, please stop edit warring - it could get your account blocked.
Use the talk page and discuss the change per WP:BRD.
Please spare others this childish, fan talk of "if you hate her".
Please remember you do not own any page on Wikipedia.
It might be useful to see WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS - the fact that other pages have some thing doesn't mean this one should too.

Thanks, Shahid • ^Talk2me 10:27, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

With whom do you want me to discuss it with? All of the three users who has disagreed are sleeping contributors they don't even contribute to her page. Everybody give a damn and why Wikipedia got a page of the most followed accounts if really it does not matter at all. Atrociousrainbow (talk) 21:23, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again. On the talk page discussion that I started. I personally feel that this Instagram mention so early in the lead belittles her achievements as an actress and makes her into some sort of reality star. If you disagree, try to explain why you think it is important there. I might support you, I'm always willing to change my mind and convince the others. Just please discuss it. Shahid • ^Talk2me 09:56, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]