Jump to content

User talk:Atomsgive

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome to Wikipedia!!!

[edit]
Hello Atomsgive! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Below are some recommended guidelines to facilitate your involvement. Happy Editing! ≈ jossi ≈ t@
Getting Started
Getting your info out there
Getting more Wikipedia rules
Getting Help
Getting along
Getting technical

≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 23:25, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Technicality

[edit]

While I agree with this addition, I don't think this edit technically is a minor edit. Please in the future just say something like "adding content," and please don't tag it with minor edit. Yahel Guhan 04:29, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

I notice you have been altering image copyright tags. This is a complex area, so you might want to spend some more time here before delving into it. Specifically, the US NARA cannot release other people's copyrights. The fact that an image is available from NARA does not mean that it is not copyrighted. Thank you. -- But|seriously|folks  01:22, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The email from NARA is incorrect. The statute on US government works being public domain is very specific. "A “work of the United States Government” is a work prepared by an officer or employee of the United States Government as part of that person’s official duties." It does not include works "accumulated" by the US government. That's overreaching by NARA. Also, the court cases you linked to relate to ownership of a tangible object, not the intellectual property rights underlying the work. They don't affect copyright. -- But|seriously|folks  02:35, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
In light of the clear and unambiguous language of the statute, the NARA's position is indefensible, in addition to being self-serving. Again, you are confusing ownership of an image with ownership of the copyright in that image. Just because the US owns the images and documents does not mean that the US owns the copyrights underlying them. Anyway, this image does not have to be deleted, because it can be used in at least the subject's article pursuant to Wikipedia's non-free content policy. But if there are other images you feel should be deleted, please give me the names and I'd be happy to check on them for you. Thanks! -- But|seriously|folks  02:43, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]