User talk:AthenasMuse
|
re:Requesting advice
[edit]I suggest starting the topic at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Poker fwiw I think due to the passage of time and the work PokerNews.com has done over the years that it is indeed a top notch professional news organization in the field of poker and not like a blog or personal small start up of a poker player. However I think it would be best to get community feedback on this topic. ▪◦▪≡SiREX≡Talk 23:56, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
- Thank you for your prompt response User:Sirex98. I just posted my draft of a Pokernews.com article for community feedback on Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Poker. Hopefully I will here from some community members soon. --AthenasMuse (talk) 22:25, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
- Out of curiosity User:Sirex98 if I don't get a response from the community on Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Poker what discussion forum or place should I take my request then?--AthenasMuse (talk) 18:35, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
- Sorry for the delay, I haven't been as active as I used to be on Wikipedia, You could try WP:DRV. Please take note that because you have few edits there may be areas of concerns in regards to a Conflict of interest however if there are none you can list your reasons with them in the format described on why a article on PokerNews.com should be re/created.▪◦▪≡SiREX≡Talk 06:26, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for the suggestions. I'll do my best.--AthenasMuse (talk) 17:28, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
- Sorry for the delay, I haven't been as active as I used to be on Wikipedia, You could try WP:DRV. Please take note that because you have few edits there may be areas of concerns in regards to a Conflict of interest however if there are none you can list your reasons with them in the format described on why a article on PokerNews.com should be re/created.▪◦▪≡SiREX≡Talk 06:26, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
December 2013
[edit]Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.
In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut-and-paste-move repair holding pen. Thank you. Excirial (Contact me,Contribs) 21:06, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
- Thank you User:Excirial for your suggestions. I wanted to create a page with the title of PokerNews. I noticed that Pokernews was available instead so I uploaded content onto that Article Page. Once I found out that I could create a new page with the title PokerNews, where the N is now capitalized, I took my content that I uploaded on the Pokernews article page and posted it onto a new article page titled PokerNews. Then I redirected Pokernews to PokerNews. I think Pokernews page should be deleted as it does not redirect to a page that is discussing PokerNews. Pokernews is acting as a redirect page to a subject that is not similar. What would you suggest we do? Thank you. --AthenasMuse (talk) 21:55, 2 December 2013 (UTC)