User talk:Atharva Jawalkar

October 2021

Hello, I'm C1K98V. An edit that you recently made to Filhaal2 Mohabbat seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! C1K98V ^{(💬 ✒️ 📂)} 03:50, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

Hello, I'm Paper9oll. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to How You Like That have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 07:08, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

British English spelling

Hi, I reverted your recent changes giving prominence to British English spelling in two articles which are established using the American English title. Please read this part of the Wikipedia Manual of Style which describes how to deal with regional spelling differences: MOS:ENGVAR. |→ Spaully ^~talk~ 08:15, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. Celia Homeford (talk) 07:33, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Please note that as explained at Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers#Dates, months, and years, "omit CE or AD, unless to avoid ambiguity or awkwardness". Celia Homeford (talk) 11:30, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make disruptive edits to Wikipedia contrary to the Manual of Style. DrKay (talk) 18:05, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As I am not doing intentionally, I have done legitimate changes that will not make problem. Because I want to contribute towards Wikepedia to make articles better and reliable. Atharva Jawalkar (talk) 03:59, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Camilla, Queen Consort shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. General Ization ^Talk 02:30, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

IF you have an issue with Camilla being referred to as the "Queen Consort", please take it up with the Royal Family, which decides what her title and mode of address will be. In the mean time, if you repeat this edit again, or once again add false information to other articles on the basis that you think that this article is incorrect, you will be blocked from editing. General Ization ^Talk 03:00, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

abc

abc Atharva Jawalkar (talk) 03:53, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

abc

abc Atharva Jawalkar (talk) 03:54, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lots of song length edits

Why would you bother to make this insignificant change of a song duration? You changed 3:49 to 3:50, which is not worth changing at all. Spotify and this Discogs page report the song as 3:49, while Apple Music and this other Discogs page report it as 3:50. Neither number is wrong—both are supported by sources.

Wikipedia is based on WP:Reliable sources, but you have not been citing such sources for your many song length edits. Please look at multiple sources before you change a song duration, and if the listed duration is supported, then don't change it. Binksternet (talk) 05:43, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stop making unnecessary edits to song lengths, like you did to Stay (The Kid Laroi and Justin Bieber song), especially when other reliable sources have already verified those times. Your edits are becoming more disruptive to Wikipedia than helpful. ThedancingMOONpolice (talk) 17:31, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Stay (The Kid Laroi and Justin Bieber song), you may be blocked from editing. ThedancingMOONpolice (talk) 16:15, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. This is your final warning. Any further disruptive edits and your editing privileges will be revoked. You are moving from one form of disruption to another, why are you going around changing demographic descriptors? —SpacemanSpiff 15:47, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@SpacemanSpiff

It is not disruptive editing that you think. It is real and genuine. Don't you judge my editing, but I too had contributed much before in previous articles. You have continuously undid all my recent editing? Atharva Jawalkar (talk) 17:08, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Faded (Alan Walker song). Taukeerppw (talk) 12:14, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —SpacemanSpiff 16:52, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]