User talk:Atesix

Welcome!

Hello, Atesix, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Internet Art Business, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Beach drifter (talk) 09:31, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Internet Art Business

I have nominated Internet Art Business, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Internet Art Business. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Beach drifter (talk) 09:31, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

{{helpme}} (Atesix (talk) 09:37, 7 April 2009 (UTC))[reply]

Do you have a question? --Closedmouth (talk) 10:18, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, my little paper on internet art businesses is being discredited and or deleted, i´m not sure if my writing is the main concern or my refrences or the paper it self but I do find the topic intriguing and note worthy. just not sure on the problems. maybe due to my weak abilties on wikipedia = (Atesix (talk) 11:27, 7 April 2009 (UTC))[reply]

Hi Atesix. Your article has been nominated for deletion as is contravenes our policy of no original research. Without going into to too much depth - the link I provided can do that - essays such as yours are unreliable sources and since they can not be verified, they are deleted as unencyclopaedic. Does that help? ∗ \ / (⁂) 13:28, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

perfect that does help, so the paper it self content wise is not in-apporiate. just the footnotes and refrences which are making more essay like>= (Atesix (talk) 13:58, 7 April 2009 (UTC))[reply]

No, it is the content that is the issue. The fact the text appears to be original research, at its core, makes in uncyclopaedic. The lack footnotes and reliable references are peripheral problems relating to that. ∗ \ / (⁂) 14:13, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]