User talk:Atelerix
Northern Areas
[edit]Hi there, I notice you changed "Northern Areas" to "Federally Administered Northern Areas" in several articles. As far as I can tell it was a loose term used by one or two newspapers. The government division that covers Northern Areas does not call it FANA. I have removed all instances of FANA unless there is an official name change somewhere. Green Giant (talk) 00:52, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
Response:
<The government of Pakistan uses both a short-form name and a more formal long-form name to refer to this territory. NORTHERN AREAS is the short-form name and FEDERALLY ADMINISTERED NORTHERN AREAS is the long-form name. See the following sources:
http://www.pakistan-embassy.dk/site/About-Pakistan.html http://www.moe.gov.pk/Financing%20of%20education%20in%20the%20public%20sector%202000-07%20(July%202007).pdf http://64.233.169.104/search?q=cache:83a2ZCGK91QJ:www.northernareas.org.pk/ndetail.cfm%3FID%3D280+%22federally+administered+northern+areas% 22&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=13&gl=us http://www.iearn.org.au/clp/archive/gilgit2.htm http://in.news.yahoo.com/071021/43/6m7ji.html http://dailymailnews.com/200711/20/dmcolumnpage.html http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=2007%5C10%5C22%5Cstory_22-10-2007_pg3_1 http://64.233.169.104/search?q=cache:SLRN1ce5XqwJ:frontlineonnet.com/fl1806/18060600.htm+%22federally+administered+northern+areas%22&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=15&gl=us http://www.irinnews.org/report.aspx?reportid=29000 http://64.233.169.104/search?q=cache:XH1iklCHQGYJ:www.ptv.com.pk/travel-tourism0detail.asp+%22federally+administered+northern+areas%22&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=16&gl=us http://encarta.msn.com/encyclopedia_761560851_8/Pakistan.html http://www.individualland.com/reexamine-federalism.php
For more sources, do a Google search on the name "federally administered northern areas" with the name in parentheses.>
Map request
[edit]Your Map Workshop request for Kashmir has been responded to, can we get some feedback there on the new map? Kmusser (talk) 12:48, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 8
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gilgit–Baltistan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tibetan language (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:13, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
Gilgit-Baltistan
[edit]Please explain why you are changing from a sourced version of an article to a less-sourced one. In addition, I am fairly certain that you copied and pasted that from a prior version, because of the bracketed numbers. That doesn't work, because it doesn't bring the references forward. In any event, your version also seems to be less neutral. It's time for you to discuss the matter on the article's talk page. Qwyrxian (talk) 02:08, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
September 2013
[edit]
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Gilgit–Baltistan. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Darkness Shines (talk) 15:37, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
[edit]Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Atelerix reported by User:Darkness Shines (Result: ). Thank you. Darkness Shines (talk) 15:49, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Elockid (Talk) 17:59, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
Wiki Loves Monuments - Pakistan
[edit]
Hi Atelerix!
Wiki Loves Monuments, the world's largest photography competition, will be taking place in Pakistan this September. The competition is all about capturing the cultural monuments and heritage sites of Pakistan and uploading these images on Commons to create an online repository which will be freely available to all.
Start taking photos of the sites enlisted here and upload them in September to be eligible for national and international prizes.
Email: contact@wikilovesmonuments.pk
Official website: wikilovesmonuments.pk
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/WikiLovesMonumentsPK
Posted by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:09, 8 June 2014 (UTC) on behalf of WikiProject Pakistan
Hi Atelerix!
Wikimedia Community User Group Pakistan is organizing an edit drive for Pakistani Wikipedians on Pakistani Cultural Heritage throughout the month of July.
Top three contributors will be given a gift pack containing Wikipedia merchandise.
You can read the event details here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:14, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
You are receiving this message as a member of WikiProject Pakistan
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Atelerix. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)