Jump to content

User talk:Atbrooks3

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

October 2010

[edit]

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content, as you did to the page International conservation caucus foundation. Blank pages can confuse readers, and are overall not helpful to the Wikipedia project; furthermore, blanking a page is not the same as deleting it.

If the article you blanked is a duplicate of another article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalized, please revert it to the last legitimate revision. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please use the appropriate deletion process. TYelliot (talk) 18:53, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Iccf logo.jpg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Iccf logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 17:25, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]


[edit]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Conservation Council of Nations, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://councilofnations.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=47&Itemid=155 (various pages verbatim and paraphrased as noted in references. As a copyright violation, Conservation Council of Nations appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Conservation Council of Nations has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Best regards, Cind.amuse (Cindy) 13:13, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Why the article was deleted

[edit]

You said:

I am the creator of the CCN website and the wiki page

This sounds like a pretty solid reason, but let me see if I can convince you it is not.

If the article stands, then Wikipedia owns the copyright to the words. Wikipedia could insist that you are not allowed to post the words on a site you create without giving proper attribution to Wikipedia. Perhaps not a big deal, but you might find it odd to have to add proper licensing to your site to cover words you have written.

Furthermore, anyone can edit the words, so you might decide to copy the latest version from Wikipedia, and find it doesn't match what you originally wrote. You have no standing to object.

Additionally, we allow anyone to register just about any user name. Anyone in the world could have registered the screen name you chose and anyone could claim to be you. Surely you would be unhappy if some other person, claiming to be you, said it was OK to copy your words.

There are ways for people to ensure they are who they say they are, but we have specific procedures for that, and they are more complicated than simply making the claim.

See Donating copyrighted materials

So, while it may seem odd to delete an article using a copyright rule when those words are almost certainly yours, it is being done for your protection. You can give up the rights to your words, but we want you to do so understanding the consequences.--SPhilbrick(Talk) 17:44, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:CCN Logo.png

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CCN Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:44, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

December 2011

[edit]

Hello Atbrooks3. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Conservation Council of Nations, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about following the reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

  • Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
  • Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
  • Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
  • Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. RadioFan (talk) 18:04, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop editing this article. You have stated that you have a conflict of interest. If there are items that you would like to update, please post a request on the article's talk page and an impartial editor (I or someone else) will make the edit for you.--RadioFan (talk) 19:08, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Conservation Council of Nations, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ICCF (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:20, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Talk:Conservation Council of Nations, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. RadioFan (talk) 20:13, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at Talk:Conservation Council of Nations, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Calabe1992 20:21, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I notice you are having some trouble

[edit]

It can be frustrating when your initial efforts are removed and you shouldn't let this prevent you from contributing. However I notice that you are having some additional trouble, particularly in removing or changing what others have posted on talk pages. This is looked on very poorly by wikipedia editors and will not stop conflicts of interest issues from being identified. Please slow down and carefully consider the guidance being offered by others above. If you ignore this, it's only going to lead to your editing privileges being revoked.--RadioFan (talk) 21:18, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is not the case. I was editing a comment I had made myself the day before. I believe it is one of the main pillars of wikipedia to allow a user to go back and improve old language with clearer, more accurate information. This is what I was doing: to more clearly represent the true sentiments of the discussion attached to Council of Nations I cleaned up my own language. -- atbrooks3
It may not have been your intention but you blanked the talk page here. That included removing another editor's comments. Please dont do this.--RadioFan (talk) 21:51, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
So you're saying I can go back and edit my comments, as long as I keep the other editor's comments in place? --Atbrooks3 (talk) 18:47, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.48.105.253 (talk) 16:49, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you are immediately going back and correcting something, that's fine of course. After others have commented, and you've changed your mind, it's polite to strike out your previous comments and add new ones unless it is something really minor like whitespace or a spelling correction.--RadioFan (talk) 19:06, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:CCN Logo.png

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CCN Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:05, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

[edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:24, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Atbrooks3&oldid=1051221847"