User talk:ChristineAtFreshTV

Total Drama Presents: The Ridonculous Race

I know that TRR is a new series, but I'm sorry but Wikipedia goes by a "reference information only" policy, so if the source says that TRR is Season 6, then that is what we add here... unless stated otherwise by ANOTHER reliable source. I cannot change the information because a user on the Total Drama Wiki said so. I need another news article that says that TRR is a new series, if not then TRR will still be considered as Season 6 on Wikipedia. Giggett (talk) 23:34, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ahh ok I didnt realize it all needed a cited reference, my first time. Thanks for letting me know. Too bad because its the real info :) AtFreshTV (talk) 23:40, 26 June 2014 (UTC)AtFreshTV[reply]

Yeah, there is no reliable source backing that TRR is a new series, the only source we got for TRR is that it is Season 6, so we either say that it's Season 6 for now, or we get no article at all. By the way, welcome to Wikipedia. I remember my first edit back when TDWT was airing :) Giggett (talk) 23:44, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Makes sense, as the press release from Corus said it was 6, Fresh has since clarified with them that it is really a new series. I am the co-producer of The Ridonculous Race, so I just want the correct info to be out there. Will see what I can do on my end. Its cool that you have been editing stuff since TDWT! You rock! AtFreshTV (talk) 23:52, 26 June 2014 (UTC)AtFreshTV[reply]

December 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "AtFreshTV", may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because it suggests a shared use account used by the television network Fresh TV. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username by completing this form, or you may simply create a new account for editing. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:16, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames which give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy.

You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose.

If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page.

You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page. Thank you. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 00:56, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been unblocked. Please keep in mind, however, that you must edit within the boundaries of our conflict of interest guidelines when editing anything produced by your company. Thank you. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 17:37, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You must also follow Wikipedia policies like WP:Reliable sources. Unverified Twitter accounts are not reliable. —C.Fred (talk) 19:31, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disclosure of employment

Hello ChristineAtFreshTV. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, and that you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to Black hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:ChristineAtFreshTV. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=ChristineAtFreshTV|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 20:30, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]