Jump to content

User talk:Asylum Bohnice2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

March 2014

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm WikiDan61. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Die biene Maja because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 23:48, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Vandalism on redirect page by User:Asylum Bohnice2. Thank you. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 17:00, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Maya the Bee, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 17:02, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Die biene Maja

[edit]

Hello Asylum Bohnice2,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Die biene Maja for deletion, because it seems to be vandalism or a hoax.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Imaginatorium (talk) 17:07, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  DMacks (talk) 17:27, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Asylum Bohnice2 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

UNBLOCK ME!!!!!! I WANT UNBLOCK PIGFUCKERS!!!!!!Asylum Bohnice2 (talk) 19:06, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Ask nicely. And I've already seen that movie. — Daniel Case (talk) 22:04, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.