User talk:Astra1999

Welcome!

Hello, Astra1999, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Jenny did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. Whispering^(t) 22:58, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation pages

Please note that disambiguation pages like Star (disambiguation) and Heart (disambiguation) are meant to help readers find existing information quickly and easily. For that reason, they have guidelines that are different from articles. From the Wikipedia:Disambiguation dos and don'ts you should:

Only list articles that readers might reasonably be looking for
Use short sentence fragment descriptions, with no punctuation at the end
Use exactly one navigable link ("blue link") in each entry that mentions the title being disambiguated
Only add an entry if used in existing articles, and include a "blue link" to an appropriate article
Do not pipe links (unless style requires it) – keep the full title of the article visible
Do not insert external links or references - Wikipedia is not a business directory
Do not add articles to acronym or initials disambiguation pages unless the person or entity is widely known by that name (in which case it should be stated in the linked article).

I see that your additions to Opel Zafira have been removed because they were unsourced. Since Star and Heart are no longer mentioned in the article, I have removed them from the disambiguation pages. Leschnei (talk) 13:14, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your editing

What is up with you and determining to change the [Opel Zafira] article to Heart, Star and Jenny? You been doing this for the past few months and it already got to the point you are abusing accounts and being disruptive. --Vauxford (talk) 13:38, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

Hello, I'm Everedux. I noticed that you recently removed content from Opel Zafira without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Everedux ^(talk) 20:57, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jenny, Suriname. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. IdreamofJeanie (talk) 19:45, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for promotion or advertising. IdreamofJeanie (talk) 19:48, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. --Vauxford (talk) 09:45, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- ferret (talk) 18:16, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Jenny, Suriname. Shellwood (talk) 08:25, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Two things

A) Please stop replacing car images with awful ones[1] - Your images are awful and should not be in any article,
B) You're constantly being reverted everywhere .... That should be telling you something....,
The time you add an image to an article or are reverted you will more than likely be blocked. Thank you. –Dave | Davey2010^Talk 19:02, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Again stop replacing images with yours, Thanks. –Dave | Davey2010^Talk 18:58, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please be more careful

Please be more careful with your edits. Ideally you should preview your edit before saving but at the very least look at the page once you have saved! What's this all about, and this?! I'm going to assume for now these were innocent mistakes and not sneaky vandalism but if you keep doing this kind of edit you might meet an admin who is not quite so forgiving. Thanks. --kingboyk (talk) 01:13, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ferret and kingboyk this editor has continued disrupting articles[2], I'm under the impression this is more of a "I don't understand what I'm doing" than "I'm here to vandalise" so as such imho they ought to be blocked per CIR/NOTHERE. –Dave | Davey2010^Talk 16:36, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I concur that WP:CIR applies here. I have blocked accordingly with the duration escalated from last time per Wikipedia:Disruptive_editing#Blocking_and_sanctions. If another admin feels that a longer or indefinite block is required they may reblock without any need to discuss with me first. --kingboyk (talk) 16:48, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks kingboyk, Unfortunately I feel your leniency/patience may go to waste here but we'll see things may improve (fingers crossed) :), Many thanks for your help anyway, Cheers, –Dave | Davey2010^Talk 18:13, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. kingboyk (talk) 16:43, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning

You're doing exactly what you've been told not to do[3][4], This is your last warning,
You can either stop replacing images with awful ones or you can carry on and be blocked indefinitely it's up to you,
Also editing with your other account won't work either so I wouldn't advise trying. –Dave | Davey2010^Talk 16:12, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi kingboyk, Having final-warned them for their behaviour they've continued to replace images with their own ones[5][6] so was wondering if you could kindly indef them as well as their "alt?" account,

If you'd rather I went to ANI I wouldn't mind doing that but either way this editor just doesn't seem to be able to grasp what they're doing wrong,

Many thanks. –Dave | Davey2010^Talk 17:31, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Probably best to take it an admin noticeboard User:Davey2010, please, as I'm a bit busy currently and that's not conducive to making a good decision. I will note here that the user has been adequately warned. --kingboyk (talk) 18:19, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi kingboyk, Okay will do, No worries I completely understand :), Thanks, –Dave | Davey2010^Talk 19:21, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. –Dave | Davey2010^Talk 19:50, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent disruptive editing despite warnings.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bishonen | talk 19:16, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]