User talk:Asteckley

Welcome!

Hello, Asteckley, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!

August 2011

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Signature in the Cell. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Hrafn^Talk_Stalk^(P) 04:33, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I direct your attention to WP:V, which states:

The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth—whether readers can check that material in Wikipedia has already been published by a reliable source, not whether editors think it is true.

And goes on to state:

All quotations and any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be attributed to a reliable published source using an inline citation.

I note that the challenged material has not been provided with an inline citation.

WP:NOR, at WP:PSTS, states:

Any interpretation of primary source material requires a reliable secondary source for that interpretation.

You have not provided a WP:SECONDARY source for your interpretation of Signature in the Cell.

Your edit has therefore been reverted. This is not 'censorship', it is merely standard Wikipedia editorial practice. Hrafn^Talk_Stalk^(P) 04:43, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

3rr

You have violated the three-revert rule. Any administrator may now choose to block your account. In the future, please make an effort to discuss your changes further, instead of edit warring. --Steven J. Anderson (talk) 21:13, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a short time for your disruption caused by edit warring by violation of the three-revert rule. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Black Kite (t) (c) 10:52, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please remember that edit warring is not a one-sided affair. It takes two people (or more) for an edit war. The cycle of reverts at Signature in the Cell is indicative of that kind of dispute; both you and the other party are, by definition, engaged in an edit war. —C.Fred (talk) 03:23, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

Vsmith (talk) 03:26, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

One week block. Immediately continuing an edit war after a block expires is not a good idea. Vsmith (talk) 00:05, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]