User talk:Kuntra/Archive 1

Welcome!

Hi Kemalcan! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Pahunkat (talk) 10:58, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Kemalcan, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Pahunkat (talk) 10:58, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

Review regarding Shiva Tandava Stotra

@Kemalcan:. I feel the introduction part was very short .So I wanted to add some few points to introduction so have updated the content but I could see twice you have rejected the content. You may verify the content and requesting you to update it in main page.

Thanks

@Kemalcan: Thank you for reverting edits from that IP! I already left them a message but I still doubt that it would stop them. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 09:45, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

HueMan1 I reverted all those changes. Yes i agree with you, but first,let's watch how they respond to your informative warning msg. Have a great day. --Kemalcan (talk) 11:27, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

Discussion at Talk:New Hope (Israel) § "Right-wing"

 You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:New Hope (Israel) § "Right-wing". ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:50, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

Danny Jacobs (actor)

Kemalcan, regarding Danny Jacobs (actor), know that there is a disruptive IP editor who has been hopping around on different Australian IPs since October making many unsourced additions to BLPs along with not following the MOS (see this ANI report. A range of IPs in Adelaide were blocked for one week and then two-weeks to try to address the disruptive editing (see the block log), but the IP-hopper began again with disruptive edits soon after both the one-week and the subsequent two-week blocks expired. The IP-hopping editor appears to have switched now over to 149.167.141.156. I'm not sure why you reverted me reverting the unsourced edits. You also neglected to provide an explanation for your reversion. I'd appreciate your reverting back to the last good version. Thanks. – 108.56.139.120 (talk) 08:23, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

Hello, Thank you for your message. I have added "this article needs additional citations for verification" template to the article. You can mark the sentences with where additional references required. It is always better to remove the unsourced sentences rather than reverting all additions back. Best Regards. --Kemalcan (talk) 09:21, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

When unsourced content is removed from a biography of living person, it can not be re-added without a citation. If you edit war to restore unsourced content in a BLP, I will block you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:21, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

Hello Thank you for the info NinjaRobotPirate As you can see from the page history, i only reverted the article to the version that is also checked by reliable Wikipedian MarnetteD. I would love to let you know that as an experienced wikipedian, i know what exactly Wikipedia:Edit_warring is. I just bumped in to this page while checking to make sure recent changes are ok. No worries at all. I have no intention to have further editing on this biography. Cheers --Kemalcan (talk) 09:42, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

December 2020

Hello, I'm NinjaRobotPirate. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Danny Jacobs (actor), but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:18, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

NinjaRobotPirate Thank you for ur message, I just let you know that that was not my change. You can see from the history. I only reverted the article to the previos version and added, neccessery templates. Regards --Kemalcan (talk) 05:27, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

It doesn't matter whether you're reverting someone or whether you're adding it by hand. The end result is exactly the same: unsourced content is now in a biographical article. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:31, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

Hello again NinjaRobotPirate As i mentioned, i reverted to the level MarnetteD ... Have a nice day. --Kemalcan (talk) 05:42, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
  

Chetsford (talk) 05:32, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Necdet Ünüvar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rector. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

January 6, 2021

So you are saying that my information for the article Mawra Hocane is incorrect ? Dude i just added brackets in the names you provided so that it looks real. You also typed wrong "c" letter in the name Esra Bilgiç. I can only laugh on you that you think i provided wrong information, i didn't actually give any new information, lol. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 39.32.186.64 (talk) 07:14, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Hello sorry for that i reverted my warn back. Incorrect family members has added to this BLP by someonelse. Not you. I have edited now. Regards. --Kemalcan (talk) 07:33, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

January 9th, 2021 Hi Kemalcan---regarding my edit a few days ago regarding the Casio CA-53 article-I should have provided more evidence here. I can't find any proof at all that the original variation of the watch was discontinued (footnote number 4). I couldn't find this on the link to casio.uk provided or on the US site. It is "out of stock" on the UK site, but was in stock a few days ago. I just feel that this should be cleared up as it is dubious information at best. Thanks--Bert — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.26.114.168 (talk) 18:16, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Rollback granted

I have granted the "rollbacker" permission to your account. After a review of some of your contributions, I believe you can be trusted to use rollback for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback and Wikipedia:Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, contact me and I will remove it. Good luck and thanks. FASTILY 06:53, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

Thank you --Kemalcan (talk) 07:26, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

The New Beginning in Nagoya

gday, I don’t think The New Beginning in Nagoya needs the ‘(2021)’ as it’s unconfirmed if there’ll be another edition, like The New Beginning in Hiroshima until recently. I feel like the (2021) is unnecessary and is inconsistent with the rest of the page names.ItChEE40 (talk) 16:17, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

BiP (software)

Thanks for improving the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TREMAZO (talk • contribs) 14:13, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

Jason Falovitch

Hi! I saw you requested for Jason Falovitch to be speedily deleted, but I believe that was a bit premature. Typically, we do not flag pages for deletion nine minutes after they are published. Wikipedia articles are never really finished, so please do not try to delete them when they are not even ten minutes old. I would really appreciate it if you removed all of the flags because I believe they do not belong there. You have my word that I will make that page as good as possible, but that comes over time after making many edits. Thank you. —User:A.JulianEditor A. Julian 07:07, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

A.JulianEditor Hello, thank you for your message. If an article has not been ready to be published, it is more appropriate to work on it as a draft. Also, i did not see any warning templetes added showing us "there is a under construction on the article" I recommend you to add next time. See... Template:Under_construction Best Regards.

In regards to the article, it is done, but it is still very young, so it can still develop. The tag for deletion was premature, so could you please remove the flag? Coming from another editor, could you help me out here and remove the flag? I worked my tail off for this page, and it is really disheartening to see it be flagged after nine minutes. I feel as if it were not given a fair chance. Could you please remove the flag; I would appreciate it so much. — User:A.JulianEditor A. Julian 08:10, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

Autopatrolled granted

Hi Kemalcan, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the autopatrolled right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. However, you should consider adding relevant wikiproject talk-page templates, stub-tags and categories to new articles that you create if you aren't already in the habit of doing so, since your articles will no longer be systematically checked by other editors (User:Evad37/rater and User:SD0001/StubSorter.js are useful scripts which can help). Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! – Joe (talk) 17:43, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

Thank you Joe Roe Best Regards. --Kemalcan (talk) 18:23, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

Okay - Dirty Socks need detergent

I will add citation on any of my edits which are removed but will adding citations of newspaper website pose any copyright risks Dirty Socks need detergent (talk) 07:57, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Dirty Socks need detergent: Yes, It is very important for page reviewers. Thank you for your understanding. Happy editing! --Kemalcan (talk) 08:10, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

I am new would, you be my tutor

Dirty Socks need detergent (talk) 07:59, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

I am dropping the useful pages to your talk page!. Have a look at them! Happy editing... Cheers--Kemalcan (talk) 08:10, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Thank sir Dirty Socks need detergent (talk) 09:08, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Need your help

I tried to add 2 links but it was showing that it was blacklisted, I needed the link for verification of a point I have added to the page Malhar Rao Holkar. The first link which I tried was from a news channel website which I had used earlier for verification of a point in Ahilya Bai Holkar page. The second link was from Wiki bio but that too won't work

I need the links for verifying my edit. Dirty Socks need detergent (talk) 09:50, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Dirty Socks need detergent Hello, feel free to use Wikipedia:Help desk when you need assistance. Regards. --Kemalcan (talk) 11:00, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

I know I am responding after 5 hour but thanks sir Dirty Socks need detergent (talk) 15:53, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

January 2021

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Muratlı, Karacabey, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. GenQuest ^"scribble" 05:48, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Thank you for your message. I am glad to have your feedback here. Good editing! --Kemalcan (talk) 07:49, 17 January 2021 (UTC) Regards

K, still a bunch of MoS issues with your latest contributions. Please review the changes I made and ask me if you have any questions about why the changes were made. They are all based on the manual of style, which is important for the auto-patrol hat. Also, when rating new articles, please consider using the RATER program to get a proper reading on the article(s) rating. Hope that helps. GenQuest ^"scribble" 03:28, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

GenQuest Thank you for ur feedback, i will carefully have a look at those changes.Thanks again. --Kemalcan (talk) 03:34, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

Reversions at One Night in Miami

Kemalcan, you made a few reversions of an IP at One Night in Miami, such as this one. I'd like to point out that the IP's edits were constructive and in good faith. Your reversions left a lot of duplicate material that needed to be cleaned up, and may have discouraged the IP from continuing to edit. Please use care when reverting. Lester Mobley (talk) 15:22, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Iggy Azalea

I responded on User_talk:108.56.139.120#February_2021 to your reverting my edit on Iggy Azalea and your templating me. Please reply over there as I get notifications only from messages posted on my talk page. I would like to know what, specifically, you objected to in my edit. I think you might have been too quick on the reversion. Thanks. – 108.56.139.120 (talk) 11:50, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Hello thank you for your response, as it is clearly seen from your edit, you deleted "associated acts" without giving a specific reason. Next time, please support your deletion with sources and valid explanation. Thank you. --Kemalcan (talk) 12:24, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Kemalcan, with respect, you have made a mistake. I provided an explanation, but you apparently missed seeing it. That's okay, we all make mistakes. I've responded more fully on my talk page User_talk:108.56.139.120#February_2021. – 108.56.139.120 (talk) 12:48, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion

I notice that you tagged the page Tunde Varga-Atkins for speedy deletion with the reason "non-notable bio and advertising". While that's a valid reason for speedy deletion in general, this page does not qualify for speedy deletion under that criterion because the article contains reasonable assertions of notability and the content is neutrally written, just slightly heavy on external links. If you still want the page to be deleted, please consider tagging it with a speedy deletion template which does apply, redirecting it to another page, proposing the page for deletion if it appears to be an uncontroversial matter, or taking the page to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion for discussion on the merits. Thanks! Stifle (talk) 17:38, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Thank you Stifle}. I have nominated the article for deletion. Regards --Kemalcan (talk) 19:55, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

New page reviewer granted

Hi Kemalcan. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group. Please check back at WP:PERM in case your user right is time limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page. In addition, please remember:

• Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging pages for maintenance so that they are aware.
• You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
• If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
• Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page. Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 22:51, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Imani Selemani Nsamila

Hello Kemalcan. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Imani Selemani Nsamila, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Being the official photographer to the President is sufficient an assertion of credibility for A7. Needs to go to AfD if required. . Thank you. GedUK  16:25, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Ged UK Thank you for your explanation and opinion. Now, it is tagged with G11 by another Wikipedian. I will go to Afd if required. I'm following the situation for now. Regards--Kemalcan (talk) 16:43, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Piya ke gaon

sir I want to say that it's very easy to give some minute to delate teg but you have to give some time to bord this page कन्हाई प्रसाद चौरसिया (talk) 15:53, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

Hello, please work on Draft next time, i changed my speedy deletion request to PROD. Regards --Kemalcan (talk) 16:25, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

New page reviewer granted

Hi Kemalcan. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group. Please check back at WP:PERM in case your user right is time limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page. In addition, please remember:

• Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging pages for maintenance so that they are aware.
• You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
• If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
• Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page. Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:45, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

Gülçin Yahya Kaçar

Dear Friend, I have added the necessary resources. For your information --Gemalmaz ^ileti 20:33, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Malatya-turgut-ozal-university-logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Malatya-turgut-ozal-university-logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:20, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Tarsus University Logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Tarsus University Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:32, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

Autopatrolled granted

Hi Assyrtiko, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the autopatrolled right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. However, you should consider adding relevant wikiproject talk-page templates, stub-tags and categories to new articles that you create if you aren't already in the habit of doing so, since your articles will no longer be systematically checked by other editors (User:Evad37/rater and User:SD0001/StubSorter.js are useful scripts which can help). Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Chetsford (talk) 16:35, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Thank you Chetsford --Assyrtiko (talk) 17:08, 12 July 2021 (UTC)