User talk:Asserghozlan

Asser Ghozlan

You have recently re-created the article Asser Ghozlan, which was deleted in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policies. Please do not re-create the article. If you disagree with the article's deletion, you may ask for a deletion review. JuJube 02:58, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

May 2008

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Arsenal F.C. worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. Thank you. haz (talk) 15:42, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Chelsea F.C.‎. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Tmol42 (talk) 10:16, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Arshavin

Per WP:CRYSTAL, we don't change team/roster details until an official signing announcement. Thanks. --Madchester (talk) 13:10, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

June 2010

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at José Mourinho. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. SQGibbon (talk) 03:00, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

José Mourinho

Your source claims that Jose and his wife filed for divorce (notice you misquoted your own source). Do you have a source saying that they actually got divorced? Check out this link which indicates that as of 18 March 2010 they are still married. User:Angelo.romano told you in his edit that the source you were using was unreliable, did you check it against anything else? SQGibbon (talk) 03:46, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Summery

You may not be aware, but your recent edit summery contained what appears to be a personal attack. Please read WP:NPA if there are any questions.--Jojhutton (talk) 01:24, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

January 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, you are reminded not to attack other editors, as you did on Ahmed Nazif. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. You are welcome to rephrase your comment as a civil criticism of the article. Thank you. "He doesn't need to resign you dumbos, he's been sacked! Check BBC, CNN, MSN, WAKE UP!" is not really... polite. Diego Grez (talk) 01:27, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Ahmed Nazif. Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue.

In particular, the three-revert rule states that:

Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
Editors violating the rule will usually be blocked for 24 hours for a first incident.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording, and content that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. You're well past 3 reverts. Please don't edit war. Atmoz (talk) 14:47, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]