User talk:Assefme

Welcome!

Hello, Assefme, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Dan Koehl (talk) 12:21, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015

Hello, I'm Dai Pritchard. Your recent edit to the page DU Beat appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Dai Pritchard (talk) 11:40, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of DU Times for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article DU Times is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DU Times until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dai Pritchard (talk) 10:22, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:DelhiUniversitytimes.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:DelhiUniversitytimes.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:35, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Amity University. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. AtHomeIn神戸 (talk) 00:36, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of DU Beat for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article DU Beat is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DU Beat until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. AtHomeIn神戸 (talk) 01:04, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages as you did with this edit to DU Beat. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Jim1138 (talk) 10:06, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits to Novella

Hello. I noticed that you made an edit that introduces praise or promotional language to the Novella article. On Wikipedia, we adhere to a neutral point of view (NPOV) and avoid promotional language or puffery. Please read the NPOV policy page, as well as this page of language to avoid to better understand how to expand this article in a style suitable to an encyclopedia. If you have questions, please see the Help Desk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 11:42, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to David Daniels (conductor), even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been or will be reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 15:06, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Thanks for reviewing David Daniels (conductor), Assefme.

Unfortunately Loriendrew has just gone over this page again and unreviewed it. Their note is:

Unreviewing this article based on your previous edit-test

To reply, leave a comment on Loriendrew's talk page. —Preceding undated comment added 15:08, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of "Bharti college"

Bharti college, a page you created, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is a blatant copyright infringement.

You are welcome to contribute content that complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. David.moreno72 (talk) 10:04, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ramanujan College - DU

I notice that you created a duplicate of Ramanujan College, with the name Ramanujan College - DU. Since this page already exists, it will cause a lot of confusion. I have done what should have been done in the first place. So I have copied the information to Ramanujan College and put a CSD on Ramanujan College - DU. Please read WP:COMPETENCE before making any new duplicate pages. David.moreno72 (talk) 00:38, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pleas, please read WP:COMPETENCE. I notice that you left a message on my user page. That is what talk pages are for. I also notice that you contested the deletion of Ramanujan College - DU. Why? I did all the work that you could have easily done, had you been competent, and you are now trying to undo all that good work. A page with a redirect can easily be edited, you don't need any admin to help you, which is probably why they didn't. I have already copied the information from Ramanujan College - DU to Ramanujan College. so there is no need to contest the deletion, as it's been duplicated. Please remove your contestation so that the process can be speedily completed. Thank-you. David.moreno72 (talk) 14:24, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes that contesting was a misunderstanding and I did not know how to remove the redirects, I asked people to help me out but nobody did. They could atleast tell me how to do it or guide maybe, is it not their responsibility to at least guide? but thanks anyway.Assefme (talk) 14:38, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kalaage

The article Kalaage has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Apart from the promotional undertone with which the page has been constructed, the page only poses as a platform for the company to get more users to sign up. As also seen in the company's site's main page where Wikipedia is mentioned under "Press Coverage", we have the reason to doubt that the creation of the article was bankrolled by the company itself. Additionally, the sources are mostly PR or "paid articles", whichever term works best for our understanding. As has been a practice here in recent times, we should stop companies from engaging in blatant advertising on Wikipedia.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nairspecht (talk) 10:54, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kalaage for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kalaage is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kalaage until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Nairspecht (talk) 12:43, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Poetry And Cheap Humor

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Poetry And Cheap Humor requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Lemongirl942 (talk) 03:45, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for a period of indefinite for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Assefme. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 14:42, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dreamcatcher (2016)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Dreamcatcher (2016), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DGG ( talk ) 18:06, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]