User talk:Asomzz19

Asomzz19, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Asomzz19! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like ChamithN (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:08, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

April 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at AVR (2020 film), you may be blocked from editing. Praxidicae (talk) 15:35, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello you cant delete a page which has a proper source Asomzz19 (talk) 15:37, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have no rights to delete a page which has its enough source and coverages. So just dont do it. Asomzz19 (talk) 15:38, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You're right, I literally lack the technical right to delete a page but anyone has the right to request deletion. Perhaps instead of angrily yelling at experienced editors you could, I don't know, read the links in the giant red notices before you get blocked. Praxidicae (talk) 15:39, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have requested to delete a page without having proper reasons. Don’t you see that the page already has multiple links? Asomzz19 (talk) 15:43, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong. Read my nomination. Praxidicae (talk) 15:51, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No. You read what I wrote and you also need to re-read the page’s reference section so you improve your personal knowledge about the film. Asomzz19 (talk) 15:52, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did at AVR (2020 film). Praxidicae (talk) 15:56, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dude, you also have no rights to block me okay. Asomzz19 (talk) 15:57, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You also have no right to remove AfD templates. They explicitly say DO NOT REMOVE. GPL93 (talk) 15:58, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Let me highlight something for you, Asomzz19. Feel free to improve the article, but the article must not be blanked, and this notice must not be removed, until the discussion is closed. For more information, particularly on merging or moving the article during the discussion, read the guide to deletion. Hopefully this makes it more clear for you. Praxidicae (talk) 15:59, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Listen bud! Get that you should remove the template by yourself. Just because you are quiet experienced, means not that you have rights to put any templates to any pages you want. Asomzz19 (talk) 16:00, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quiet is not a word anyone would use to describe me, but yes, I am experienced in editing Wikipedia and I'm also able to read. Tone down your attitude and maybe take a second to digest what is being said to you before you wind up blocked indefinitely. Praxidicae (talk) 16:05, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Praxidicae I've reported to ARV given he clearly states he has no intention to stop disrupting Wikipedia. Likely will be blocked soon. Best, GPL93 (talk) 16:07, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Whoever you are is none of my business. Well I see what you are! Okay. Your edits shows that well. Asomzz19 (talk) 16:08, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You literally have put a deletion template to a page which has a fixed release date and has media coverages - which shows how much you really have gone through the links mentioned on the references. Asomzz19 (talk) 16:10, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An experienced editor has really put a deletion template to a page of a film which has a fixed release date. This portrays well your experiences Mr. Asomzz19 (talk) 16:11, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive editing

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for Disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Removal of AfD templates, possible sock of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Anky95/Archive. Per a complaint at WP:AIV. EdJohnston (talk) 17:54, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a suspected sock puppet of Anky95 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this is a sock puppet account, and your original account is blocked, please also note that banned or blocked users are not allowed to edit Wikipedia; and all edits made under this account may be reverted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:00, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]