User talk:Asmaybe

Great Irish Famine

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, adding content without citing a reliable source is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are already familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add your original reference to the article. Thank you.--Domer48 20:49, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add your original reference to the article. Contact me if you need assistance adding references. Thank you.--Domer48 10:33, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Domer48 21:27, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your recent edit appears to have added incorrect information, and has been reverted or removed. All information in the encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable published source. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you.--Domer48 16:37, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to point out to you the three revert rule, which you may be about to break. Stop and consider your actions. --Domer48 15:43, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Edit war

You appear to be engaged in an edit war on the Great Hunger article. Please stop. Concerns about sources may be raised on the article talk page, and if this does not resolve the matter, the dispute resolution process may be employed. Continuing to edit war will result in you being banned from this page, and perhaps also blocked. If you have not already done so, I advise you to familiarise yourself with the arbitration committee's rulings at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Great Irish Famine. Regards, Angus McLellan (Talk) 22:50, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Drochshaol

Hi, you continue to remove this term from the great famine article, without cause. You claim in your reversion that it lacks verification, which is untrue as I've provided qualified verifiable references in the Talk page, and a little effort on your part with a search engine such as Google would turn up as many references as you need to satisfy yourself.

On the Talk page you make a different point, in that you state that that there's no source for it meaning "the bad life". I never said it did, but to anyone that can understand written Irish, it's a simple matter to translate as Droch = bad and Saol = Life. Try it yourself in your favorite online Irish translator if you have no other alternatives to translation. I don't know what your point is, but in any case, I didn't include this translation - but it didn't stop you reverting.
You also claim that my second link doesn't provide a reference. If you click on the "more" link, the javascript will show you the link.
You latest removal was on the grounds of WP:Verifiability. Perhaps you don't have access to Google - although you do appear to have access to the internet if you're reading this and checking the references I've provided - but 20 seconds of using Google will provide you with many references. I've provided two, where one is all that's required. The term is verified. Do a little research on Google if you want different references that the ones I've provided.
Your final point is that Drochshaol doesn't mean "the great hunger" either. Again, nobody said it does. The point being that Drochshaol is one of the terms used, in the Irish language, to refer to the famine.

Finally, be careful about breaching wp:3rr. You've already been warned about edit warring on this article, and also be aware that you can be blocked for edit warring even if you haven't reverted 4 times in 24 hours. --Bardcom (talk) 14:49, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Page ban

In view of your continuining edit war at The Great Hunger, specifically this edit after I had asked you to cease from such behaviour, you should consider yourself banned from editing The Great Hunger for one week. You may continue to Talk:The Great Hunger page at this time. Please observe this restriction. You will be blocked with no further warning should you edit the article before 15:00 UTC on 2008-06-13. Angus McLellan (Talk) 15:19, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You violated this page ban to continue to remove the content in question. You have been blocked for 72 hours. When you return, please be aware that the page ban is still in effect. Any further infractions will result in a longer block. This has been logged at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Great Irish Famine. Daniel (talk) 22:11, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RE: True Grit

Hola Pilgrim,

Your additions need:

Verifiable

Sources

Please add these or the information that you added might be removed.

Also try to avoid:

Wikipedia:Conflict of interest

Wikipedia:Point of view

Wikipedia:Original research

etc.

Make them reliable, third-party references.

Thank you,

> Best O Fortuna (talk) 21:38, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"COI editing involves contributing to Wikipedia in order to promote your own interests or those of other individuals, companies, or groups." What relevance has that to my edit?

POV: What POV am I advocating? I corrected a John Wayne quote.

OR: the flawed quote I edited was OR.

Your points are irrelevant. If you think the unsourced misquote that I edited belongs on that page, be my guest and restore it. Asmaybe (talk) 20:12, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

References

Try taking the time to learn how to format references properly:

Sources

A minute of effort upfront saves an hour of fixing later.

> Best O Fortuna (talk) 18:20, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've replaced a flawed quote with an accurate one, and given a source where there wasn't one. Officiously, you've managed to squeeze a negative out of that edit.Asmaybe (talk) 19:49, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

your dating system

Your dating system is not used on the English-language Wikipedia, please read Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates and numbers)--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 13:32, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've read it. What page are you referring to? Asmaybe (talk) 10:04, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

		The Modest Barnstar
		Thanks for your recent contributions! Mike Restivo (talk) 22:26, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Operation Medina, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Winter Soldier. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:37, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Asmaybe. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Asmaybe. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Asmaybe. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Asmaybe (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

127.0.0.1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Konli17". The reason given for Konli17's block is: "Clearly not here to build an encyclopedia--also duck block, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Lapsed Pacifist".

Blocking administrator: ‪Drmies‬ (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: Thanks for letting us know. Now blocked directly. Yamla (talk) 14:01, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Asmaybe (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I haven't edited any page other than what's listed on my contributions page here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Asmaybe

What I wanted to edit was the line - On 11 November, the Russian and Turkish defence ministers signed a memorandum of understanding last week to create a joint monitoring center in Azerbaijan - by deleting 'last week' from the sentence. It's repeating 'On 11 November'. This in the Turkish-Russian Peacekeeping section. Maybe you could do that for me?

Decline reason:

This is not an unblock request. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:57, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

(talk page stalker) Um, that's your talk page. --Hurricane Tracker 495 16:06, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Asmaybe (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

It isn't true that my account was set up as a sockpuppet. I wouldn't have a clue how to do that, nor have I had the wish to do so.

It seems to me you should address how someone's account can be taken over by someone else here on Wikipedia.

How can I prevent this? Asmaybe (talk) 15:51, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You seem to be saying that someone else operated your account; if so, it will remain blocked as compromised. As for sockpuppetry, this is a checkuser block, meaning it is supported with technical evidence, so sockpuppetry is not in doubt. 331dot (talk) 17:45, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I've now changed to a more complex password.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Asmaybe (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

OK, you say you have technical evidence. Is it possible for you to give an example of a sockpuppet edit under my username?

Decline reason:

This is not an unblock request. HighInBC ^{Need help? Just ask.} 09:29, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

See: Special:Contributions/Konli17 HighInBC ^{Need help? Just ask.} 09:30, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive editing

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Ireland, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Canterbury Tail talk 18:57, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]