User talk:Asiwanju

This is Asiwanju's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mr Henry Agbai (March 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eejit43 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

There are capitalization errors in almost ever sentence, including in proper nouns (film titles, reference titles)

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mr Henry Agbai and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~ Eejit43 (talk) 23:27, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Asiwanju! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ~ Eejit43 (talk) 23:27, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Mr Henry Agbai

I have attempted to make some changes to the draft you've written. I did not check the sources and an AFC reviewer I am not but I believe the errors that the current reviewer provided as reason not to approve have been fixed. Also look at the talk page because I asked a question there I'd like answered. It may involve moving and resubmitting the draft so let's discuss it. As always, you are welcome to ask questions on my talk page through the "Ask your mentor a question" function on your homepage. This is an attempt at good will and a desire to see growth and development from potential long term editors. I look forward to hearing from you. --ARose Wolf 17:59, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You'll need to address the concern about your potential closeness with the subject (Please see below) expressed by @bonadea and also the concerns over the use of primary sources as expressed by @Reading Beans on the draft. As I stated, I didn't look at the sources and only did the copyedit work. The AFC process can be a not so friendly or forgiving experience for new editors so you need to have a solid article before submitting. You have to prove why the subject deserves an article and the answer can't be because you know they are famous or because they have a big following. Things you "know" to be "true" are not admissible as evidence that a subject is notable. We rely on independent secondary sources to determine that. Getting an article through the AFC process and included in the encyclopedia is one of the hardest things a new editor can do. That isn't meant to discourage you, only prepare you which I wish I had done prior to your first submission. --ARose Wolf 14:56, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mr Henry Agbai (March 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Reading Beans was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please, add non-primary source. Interviews are primary sources. Best,

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mr Henry Agbai and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Reading Beans (talk) 08:50, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Asiwanju. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 10:57, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good day @Bonadea: i have watched some movies of which i noticed the article subject. I don’t know him personally. Asiwanju (talk) 22:51, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mr Henry Agbai (July 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jamiebuba was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mr Henry Agbai and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jamiebuba (talk) 20:38, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you @Jamiebuba for this review. I would appreciate, if we can work on this article together for better understanding and also mentorship on this space. Thank you Asiwanju (talk) 00:13, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Jamiebuba I would really appreciate, you spare me little of time to work on this article. I await your response. thank you so much Asiwanju (talk) 00:19, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Asiwanju, Thanks for your interest in contributing to Wikipedia. Unfortunately, at this point the subject you are writing about does not meet our notability guidelines. Since you don't have a Conflict of interest with the subject as earlier disclosed above, do pick another subject that maybe worth writing about. Happy editing. Jamiebuba (talk) 06:47, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@JamiebubaThank you.. I would still want to be under your mentorship for better experience and tutelage in the space. I will be so glad and happy thank you. I await your response, thank you so much Asiwanju (talk) 12:16, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Asiwanju It would be great if I had time, unfortunately I'm tied up with other engagements. You can try asking someone else to mentor you through Wikipedia:Adopt-a-user. Goodluck. Jamiebuba (talk) 07:14, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kolaboy (musician) (September 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Notcharizard was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Blogs and music distribution services do not show notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kolaboy (musician) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-- NotCharizard ^🗨 03:34, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Mr Henry Agbai

Hello, Asiwanju. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mr Henry Agbai".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 00:46, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Kolaboy (musician)

Hello, Asiwanju. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kolaboy (musician), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:06, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Kolaboy (musician)

Hello, Asiwanju. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kolaboy".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:29, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]