User talk:Asina

Welcome!

Hello, Asina, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Tewfik^Talk 06:03, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Piranshahr

No I don't speak Turkic, but I speak Persian. You can't tell me the word "Khane" is Turko-Mongolian and not related to Persian "Khaneh", when the city is in Iran and the people of it are Kurds who speak an Iranian language not too different to Persian. If you claims thats true, then bring a source. By the way the source doesn't claim that the tribe is Kurdish, so we can't put that on here. Just for the sake of accuracy --K a s h ^{Talk | email} 21:21, 21 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ah I see. Fair enough then. Although it still seems weird that Khaneh would have a different origin than Khana or anything like that --K a s h ^{Talk | email} 21:36, 21 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Random information doesn't have anything to do with history of the city.. and you can't add a totally random source to back up a fact like the whole population of it is Kurdish. Please look at other city pages to get ideas. --K a s h ^{Talk | email} 23:24, 21 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Urartu

Please stop adding verbatim copies of other websites to Wikipedia. You are violating both copyright and Wikipedia:Policy. If you want to add the material phrased in your own words, make sure to attribute it to reputable sources per WP:CITE, just linking to some web page is not sufficient. The second article you link to (by M. R. Izady) contains the statement "Personally, I have come to suspect that the Ubaidian people may be identical or related to the enigmatic "Khaldi.". You may paraphrase this with "M. R. Izady tentatively suggests a connection between the Khaldi and the Urartians" or similar, but you may not misrepresent this source by asserting that Urartians and Khaldi are known to be identical. dab (ᛏ) 13:54, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You are just vandalizing at this point. If you continue in this vein, you will be blocked from editing. You should also be aware of WP:3RR: If you continue revert-warring even without outright vandalism, you may also be blocked from editing. Please bring your material, sourced with scholarly references, not internet pages, to talk. You are also very quick to pick up Wikipedia jargon, raising the suspicion that you may be the sockpuppet of a banned user. If you are editing under another account, please disclose this now to allay such suspicions. dab (ᛏ) 14:58, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

3rr warning

You have broken WP:3RR. Please read the rules there, and revert less and talk more William M. Connolley 15:56, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]