User talk:Asian elephant

Asian elephant, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Asian elephant! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Nick Moyes (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Asian elephant. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. TheSandDoctor ^Talk 04:06, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Asian elephant (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

please unblock both of my accounts Asian elephant and Neelgai2020, i created both these accounts due specific reasons while one account was created predominently to create new pages other account was created mainly to do edit. There is nothing wrong i having 2 accounts that have specific purpose. The person who proposed a block seems to have taken the reverts to his/her ego. does this person believe that only those edits are in good faith perhaps he/she forgot to see that i reverted back to the edits done by that person. every person has a right to edit in good faith i followed that principal only. S sincerely request you to please unblock both my accounts as there is no misuse or collusion. awaiting favorable responseAsian elephant (talk) 07:07, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

It might be okay to have one account to create articles and one to edit them(a little odd to me, but okay), but that's not what you did. Both accounts edited the same article, ASMI and INS Panvel. If you can't keep the accounts separate as you intend, you shouldn't use two. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 08:47, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Asian elephant (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i sincerly request again to please unblock both of my accounts Asian elephant and Neelgai2020, i say again i created both these accounts due specific reasons while one account was created predominantly (understand predominately is not exclusively) to create new pages, other account was created mainly to do edit (understand mainly is not exclusively). There is nothing wrong i having 2 accounts that have specific purpose. The person who proposed a block seems to have taken the reverts to his/her ego and gave fil;msy reason about names of my account.the person who propsed a block seems to think nobody dont have rights to revert his edits. every person has a right to edit in good faith i followed that principal only. also 331dot (talk) says (If you can't keep the accounts separate as you intend) perhaps he doesnt understand difference between mainly/predominantly/exclusively. no one can ask other to use which account. wikipedia is free and everyone is free to use whichever account they choose to use, and i am doing the same. you may question the no. of edits to that ,y answer is that i need rights (on atleast 1 a/c), and that can only happen with more no. of edits. i sincerely once again request you to please unblock both my accounts as there is no misuse or collusion. awaiting favorable response Asian elephant (talk) 12:48, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You are confused about WP:SOCK and you are confused about your rights. You have no rights here. Until you can convince us you understand these things, there are no grounds to consider lifting the block. Yamla (talk) 13:01, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

File:Flg off 1.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Flg off 1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Estopedist1 (talk) 11:33, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Insas.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Insas.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]