User talk:AsiBakshish

Wikipedia admins are evil people! May they rot in hell for those, who they helped to murder!

Welcome

Hello, AsiBakshish, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. If you are looking for help, please do any of the following visit the new contributors' help page or type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will answer your questions shortly. Support is also available at the directory of help pages.

There are a lot of standards and policies here. Here are a few links you might find useful:

Please sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes (~~~~), which produces your name and the current date. Also, it would be a huge help if you could explain each of your edits with an edit summary. Thank you Span (talk) 19:17, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

While we welcome your contributions, please be aware of the three revert rule.

"An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Violations of the rule normally attract blocks of at least 24 hours. Any appearance of gaming the system by reverting a fourth time just outside the 24-hour slot is likely to be treated as a 3RR violation. See below for exemptions".

We encourage editors to assume the good faith of the other editors and discuss on the talk page before reverting another's edits so that a solution may be found. Edit warring may result in a block. Thank you Span (talk) 19:17, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

comments

why don't you start learning to sign your comments properly?--IIIraute (talk) 01:42, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

My default signature was not working properly.--AsiBakshish (talk) 01:58, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No offense meant!--IIIraute (talk) 02:16, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I was thinking to change the signature already. You were perfectly right. --AsiBakshish (talk) 02:30, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Haaretz acknowledgment

I noticed your recent contribution to the Haaretz article regarding the Dialog poll. As other editors have pointed out, there is currently an active discussion here as to the reliability of the reports, although I do agree that this does not directly relate to whether any criticism should be included in the Haaretz article. I suggest you focus on providing further sources to support your addition and participate in the talk page discussions, before restoring your additions to the article. Ankh.Morpork 11:38, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you think a disclaimer should be added to the article, state so on the talk page and engage in the discussions! The protracted discussions on the various talk pages evidence the various opinions of editors on these subjects and it is inaccurate to say that there is a single body of opinion. Ankh.Morpork 12:17, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Haaretz was criticized and it did acknowledge great part of that criticism. These are facts. Here are the sources.[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]. I am not prepared to discuss whether majority of Israelis (or Israeli Jews) support apartheid, as I am not prepared to discus this about any other democratic nation/country. I don't even think, it is a discussion. I think it is just way to slander.--AsiBakshish (talk) 12:34, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Le Parachutes

ASI!!!! WHADUP MY MAIN MAN?#?#?#

YOU STILL AROUND YOU PARACHUTING AHOLE? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Haverbemashber (talk • contribs) 08:39, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

Please note you are being discussed at WP:ANI#Worse than Putin?. Thanks. Alexbrn (talk) 11:03, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Black Kite (talk) 12:47, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AsiBakshish (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Wikipedia has been slandering living people for two yeas now in a row and has no guts to even issue an apology? That is a behavior of a cult, has nothing to do with encyclopedia. If indeed you are a cult, it is more then proper to expel people, who stand against you tyranny. But then, be aware, you are indeed worse then Putin. Wikipedia in the past slandered Israel, calling it an apartheid state. That was an anti-Semitic slander, that at the very end, was resolved. The current crisis of Wikipedia is much deeper. Wikipedia is accusing of misinformation living people, who love freedom. In effect, what you have done, is usual for tyrants like Putin. Only Puin it is doing just in Russia, you are setting up a tyranny worldwide. And you are slandering living, freedom loving, truth seeking, good people worldwide. I am confident, that despite your evil deeds, the truth and freedom will prevail. AsiBakshish (talk) 13:08, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This request only demonstrates that the block is correct. 331dot (talk) 13:13, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.