User talk:Ashwinushas

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Ashwinushas, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Drmies (talk) 23:24, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, your passage I reverted was wholly based on the assertion that Muller's calculations have been blindly followed by later writers. This is wholly untrue. Modern models of dating owe nothing to Muller, but are based on historical evidence about the expansion of Bronze age cultures, horse-taming and the distribution of languages. Why it matters to some Indians where their language emerged is a mystery. The French don't care that their language originated in Italy, nor are the English concerned that theirs came from northern Germany. Paul B (talk) 00:01, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the "many sources", that is clearly articulated in the article. None of this has anything to do with Muller. If you'd actually read any of his works you'd know he suggested several possible dates over the years. Paul B (talk) 12:17, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

November 2010

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Indo-Aryan migration. Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue. In particular the three-revert rule states that making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording and content that gains consensus among editors. If unsuccessful, then do not edit war even if you believe you are right. Post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Note that logging out of your account and continuing this behavior still counts as edit warring. —SpacemanSpiff 05:47, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]