User talk:Ashuutosh

Ashuutosh, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Ashuutosh! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Rosiestep (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Transzaar

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Transzaar, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Alexf^(talk) 10:31, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Let me quote from the deleted draft:

At Transzaar, we are all about saving you time and hassle. This is why we included an integrated spell-checker.

Why "we"? -- Hoary (talk) 09:49, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Soory for Using "We", Next Time I will remeber this. Please give the chance to revise it.

--Ashuutosh (talk) 10:01, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No, I'm not complaining, or asking for an apology. I'm asking for a reason. After all, this wasn't a mere fluke. Here's another quote:

Our proprietary Transliteration system converts script from one language to another with similar pronunciation.

Why "our"? -- Hoary (talk) 10:34, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I mistakely used these words (I, our, we ..). My intention was not to advertise the product. If you give me chance I will remove these words from draft. --Ashuutosh (talk) 10:51, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No, it can't have been a mistake. Let's take this as an example: At Transzaar, we are all about saving you time and hassle. This is why we included an integrated spell-checker. Did you write this, or did somebody else write it? -- Hoary (talk) 12:42, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am the user of this tool. Sine it is free so I think other translator get benefited to know about it. Yes, I copied some text from their website to make the article. But My intention was not the advertisement of Product. If I get a chance I will fix these issue.

--Ashuutosh (talk) 12:51, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

At the foot of the top page of the website, we are told:

So it's copyright. (And no, it's not copyleft.) Here's what you're told when you edit Wikipedia:

Content that violates any copyrights will be deleted.

Its deletion was entirely appropriate. -- Hoary (talk) 13:43, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I agree. But this was the draft. I was working on It. I just collect some text to write my article. I will remove these data. Please provide the backup. Can I re-write the same article.

--Ashuutosh (talk) 02:15, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No I will not supply it. Here is why not. If there are independent, reliable sources about this, then, if you avoid plagiarizing them, you can use these sources to create a new, non-promotional draft. -- Hoary (talk) 06:31, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

So if I avoid plagiarizing, then Can I use the same name of articale as before? --Ashuutosh (talk) 06:46, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It seems that you weren't interested in my answer, because you went ahead and made a draft, and then turned it into an article (still with no independent sources).

Yes, it has one (1) "reference". But this isn't a reference for anything that you say. It's merely a link to something you mention. It therefore has no independent, reliable sources.

I could have just deleted it, but instead I kindly moved it to draft-space. Do not convert it into an article until everything that it says is backed up by an independent, reliable source. -- Hoary (talk) 10:24, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

OK I will not move it to article. I need more refrences ? --Ashuutosh (talk) 10:29, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If I tell you that (i) it has no references, and (ii) everything that it says has to be referenced, then either (A) it needs a lot of references to independent, reliable sources, or (B) you should give up the attempt to write about this subject for Wikipedia. If you prefer course (A) and succeed in providing independent, reliable sources for everything that the draft says, then write a message saying that the draft is now suitable for conversion into an article. Either write this to User:RHaworth on User talk:RHaworth, or write it to me at User talk:Hoary. (Don't write it to both.) NB both RHaworth and I have limited reserves of patience. -- Hoary (talk) 10:41, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

In fact do neither of those: when you think it is ready, click on "submit your draft for review" and wait patiently. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:54, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Hoary, @RHaworth Thanks for the suggestion. I will do this. --Ashuutosh (talk) 15:28, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No, it's not fit to be an article

I would guess that RHaworth, like me, had in mind a long, scrupulous revision process, citing independent, reliable, secondary sources. That seems to have been a pipe-dream. I see that you are already asking for a review, offering a total of four references:

"Transzaar Empowers Human Translators", a video promoting the product
"Transzaar Empowers Human Translators", a conference paper promoting the product
"Transzaar Empowers Human Translators", a slideshow promoting the product
"Sampark: Indian Language MT System", a page that's about something mentioned in the article, and that doesn't mention Transzaar

You don't have a single independent, reliable, secondary source for anything that the article says. At this point you're just wilfully wasting people's time. -- Hoary (talk) 07:20, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

So What the mean of Independent reliable Source ? Befroe writting this article I have refer many article on wiki related to this type category and I took help from those article to give refrence like Pairaphrase --Ashuutosh (talk) 07:26, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please read Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources. Yes, the article on "Pairaphrase" is terrible. Please model your draft after good articles, not bad ones. -- Hoary (talk) 08:16, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Thank you --Ashuutosh (talk) 10:31, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Comparison of computer-assisted translation tools has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Comparison of computer-assisted translation tools was changed by Ashuutosh (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.865743 on 2018-07-12T05:09:05+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 05:09, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Transzaar (July 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Enterprisey was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Transzaar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Transzaar, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Enterprisey (talk!) 01:10, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Transzaar (November 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Frayae was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Transzaar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Transzaar, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 12:00, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Transzaar

Hello, Ashuutosh. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Transzaar".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Lapablo (talk) 07:25, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]