Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Julietdeltalima(talk)16:36, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Paul's Case, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. I see that you did your best to provide a source (livestrong.com), but that's not a viable source for literary criticism. The material you added would only be appropriate for the article if a reliable source had published *an interpretation of "Paul's Case"* that brought up the issues you described regarding the effects exhibited by the character as a result of losing his mother. Julietdeltalima(talk)16:40, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Paul's Case, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. I see that you did your best to provide a source (livestrong.com), but that's not a viable source for literary criticism. The material you added would only be appropriate for the article if a reliable source had published *an interpretation of "Paul's Case"* that brought up the issues you described regarding the effects exhibited by the character as a result of losing his mother. Julietdeltalima (talk) 16:40, 18 April 2018 (UTC)