User talk:Ashleigh King

Hi, Ashleigh! So glad to see you try this on Wikipedia - you are very brave to start a new article first! I recommend that you try editing some other, related ones first so you get the hang on how this all works. I would love to have you publish this text as-is on H-Kentucky network so we can add her to our list of Kentucky suffragists. Take a look at https://networks.h-net.org/node/2289/pages/138424/how-submit-item-h-kentucky

How about this idea? I start a Wiki stub on her with all the necessary components and then you start adding in the details you want... make sure you have citations on nearly every statement. (Editors here on Wikipedia are really tough on articles about women.) You can contact me via email at kywomansuffrage@gmail.com

OK, I've created an entry for her Mary Jane Warfield Clay - please feel free to add more details that will help with bolstering her importance as a figure in the history of Kentucky women and in the national story of woman suffrage. This will help with the peer review and keep her entry going. Thanks! Randolph.hollingsworth (talk) 09:14, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Ashleigh King! Thank you for your contributions. I am Calaka and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Calaka (talk) 16:27, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mary Jane Warfield (March 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Being married to a state politician and overseeing a house being built does not make someone notable.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mary Jane Warfield and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mary Jane Warfield, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 08:13, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ashleigh King! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 08:13, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mary Jane Warfield (March 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Any notability would be based upon the material after the divorce,and we need references to show the impact of her work--the rest is the sort of background that could be said much more briefly.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mary Jane Warfield and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mary Jane Warfield, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 05:51, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Mary Jane Warfield has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Mary Jane Warfield. Thanks! ~Kvng (talk) 23:10, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Mary Jane Warfield

Hello, Ashleigh King. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mary Jane Warfield, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:02, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Mary Jane Warfield

Hello, Ashleigh King. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mary Jane Warfield".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:14, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]