User talk:Ashldn
Ashldn, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]
|
Hi Ashldn! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 22:05, 27 April 2017 (UTC) |
April 2017
[edit]
Hello, I'm Coderzombie. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Coderzombie (talk) 09:47, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Hello. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia. This means that editors do not own articles, including ones they create, and should respect the work of their fellow contributors. If you create or edit an article, remember that others are free to change its content. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Coderzombie (talk) 12:45, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia. Coderzombie (talk) 13:44, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Kimberley Garner
[edit]You have been given sufficient warnings. Instead of responding to the warnings, you have repeatedly added unsourced material to the page. If you continue this behaviour, you might be blocked from editing. Coderzombie (talk) 14:14, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
[edit]
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Ashldn reported by User:Coderzombie (Result: ). Thank you. Coderzombie (talk) 14:18, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
You can't use an existing source for new information—Wikipedia doesn't work that way. Also, please stop edit warring and be mindful of the Three revet rule or you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Thanks. El_C 15:28, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Hi, I've had a look at the article and the problem seems to be that Ms Garner has not actively publicised her date of birth anywhere. As I'm sure you're aware, it's rude to ask a woman how old she is, so we don't unless the information is very public knowledge. For example, it was widely believed that Elisabeth Sladen was two years younger than she actually was before formal birth records were uncovered after her death. We have a strict policy on biographies of living people that in a nutshell is - if in doubt, leave it out. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:39, 29 June 2017 (UTC)