User talk:Ashishchopra778

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Nobodys Perfect A Derrick Simmons Film Promo Poster.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Nobodys Perfect A Derrick Simmons Film Promo Poster.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ^Avic _ennasis @ 04:54, 27 Tevet 5777 / 04:54, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Exchange Data International (EDI) (January 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This is only a business listing advertising what they would say to clients and it's unacceptable in our policies WP:What Wikipedia is not as such contents are never accepted and there's no automatic inherited notability from anything or anyone; examining the sources here only show such announcements as company activities or business plans.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Exchange Data International (EDI) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 21:45, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Exchange Data International (EDI) (April 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Topcipher was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please note that per WP:COMPANY the notability is determined by 'significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources' whereby the source much speak more towards the significance of the company itself and not simply be mentioned to pass this criteria.
Ex: this link here - https://www.forbes.com/sites/tomgroenfeldt/2015/02/24/investment-research-goes-a-la-carte/#6ae078dab49d simply mentions the words 'Exchange Data International' however does not speak anything else to justify it's presence.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Exchange Data International (EDI) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TopCipher (talk) 06:35, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Ashishchopra778, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! TopCipher (talk) 06:35, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Jump Offs(2007 Film)

Hello, Ashishchopra778. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Jump Offs".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 00:36, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Nobody's Perfect (2016 Film)

Hello, Ashishchopra778. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Nobody's Perfect".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. -★- PlyrStar93. _{→Message me. 🖉←} 13:32, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Women Do It Better(2009 Film)

Hello, Ashishchopra778. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Women Do It Better".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 06:26, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Exchange Data International (EDI) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Exchange Data International (EDI), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 21:00, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Exchange Data International (EDI)

Hello, Ashishchopra778. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Exchange Data International".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. GeoffreyT2000 ^{(talk, contribs)} 02:45, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Derrick Simmons Film Works concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Derrick Simmons Film Works, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Derrick Simmons Film Works

Hello, Ashishchopra778. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Derrick Simmons Film Works".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 22:00, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]