User talk:Ashik Ser

Welcome!

Hello, Ashik Ser!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, The Herald (Benison) (talk) 02:26, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

Hello, I'm The Herald. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, List of highest-grossing Malayalam films, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 04:05, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@The Herald the source where from trackers who calculates collection of movies Ashik Ser (talk) 09:57, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Then you have to mention it and show it. Refer to WP:ICTFSOURCES to get an idea which all sources we accept. Thanks. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 09:59, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@The Herald but now am in a trouble. like I can't edit Ashik Ser (talk) 00:46, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, no no. You can edit but make sure you provide reliable references. Thats all. Good luck and drop by my talk page if you have any doubt of need any help. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 02:26, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Again, you are doing it again. See WP:IMDB. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 14:12, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@The Herald I have added refferences!!! Ashik Ser (talk) 11:47, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Read the messages I posted. IMDB is not a reliable source. Only add references per WP:RSP and WP:ICTFSOURCES. Go through those pages. Thanks. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 12:30, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@The Herald ohh oke Ashik Ser (talk) 10:06, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Father of the Nation, you may be blocked from editing. M.Bitton (talk) 12:06, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Father of the Nation. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. M.Bitton (talk) 12:28, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Father of the Nation shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Skitash (talk) 14:01, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 14:18, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Father of the Nation shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Skitash (talk) 12:49, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Have you read an essay called Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle? The basic idea is that if you make an edit like adding a new paragraph, and someone reverts it, you should discuss your edit with the person who reverted you. Often a good place to do that is that article talk page. That is because discussing the issue on the article talk page encourages other people to join in.

User talk pages are best if there is a behavioural problem. Article talk pages are best if there is a content problem.-- Toddy1 (talk) 13:06, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- ferret (talk) 15:04, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

Hi there - Wikipedia relies on reliable sources to verify information, especially about living people. You didn't provide a source for your changes to the Kervens Belfort article, and I couldn't find one either. If you have a reliable source please let me know and we can change the article. Please let me know if you have any questions. Giant Snowman 09:30, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of six months for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Daniel Case (talk) 20:27, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]