User talk:Ash Loomis

Welcome!

Hello, Ash Loomis, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! feydey 01:31, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ska and reggae Wikiproject is coming soon...

Here: Wikipedia:WikiProject_Council/Proposals#Wikiproject_Reggae. Join the proposal, if you are interested $) --Nagasheus (talk) 11:56, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for participation! (8 The project is created, look here: Wikipedia:WikiProject Reggae. First we gonna make assessment table and assess as much articles as we can. (= --Nagasheus (talk) 16:33, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Videodrome

Hello, I saw you tagged Videodrome as a movie based on urban legend(s). I read in the trivia of the article (without references) that in the 40's there were people thinking that tv signals could cause brain tumors, and I'm sure that it's possible to find many strange popoular stories about television and its bad influence on human minds but I think that stating that this movie is "based on urban legends" is not proper, if there aren't references about that. --Ermanon (talk) 09:33, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Third Wave Ska Merge

Hi Ash, I'm wondering if you could give some more detail on your concerns with my merge. I posted on Talk:Ska#Merge_with_ska. Thanks! MakeBelieveMonster (talk) 15:35, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Atheism in popular culture

I've reverted two of your recent edits because I'm not sure you understand that Categories are a pretty blunt instrument, and therefore require proper sourcing. Adding articles to this category when the topic of atheism isn't mentioned in the article at all is specifically unhelpful, and unnecessary. The mere absence of a mention of a belief in Our Lord is insufficient to qualify for inclusion in this category. Thanks. Rodhull andemu 01:01, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for thanking me!

Thanks for the thanks! I'm not done with the Chester Brown articles yet, either. I'm working on one for Underwater at the moment. Acidtoyman (talk) 04:18, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Creepshow, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page House of Secrets (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:30, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Frank Miller (comics), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Islamicism (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:52, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

November 2012

Hello, I'm Moe Epsilon. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Wes Craven because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Regards, — Moe Epsilon 09:04, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Stephen King

Please do not add unsourced material to articles, as you did with this edit to Stephen King. As I'm sure you must know by now, Wikipedia requires material added to articles to be accompanied by citations of reliable sources. There is no mention in the article of King's religion, let alone one that is sourced. Thank you. Nightscream (talk) 05:10, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

edit waring. Three people reverted you three times. Please don't add that again

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Punisher. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.

This edit seems to have been made for the sole purpose of levelling an insult towards another editor in the edit summary while avoiding the 3RR ruling. Any more edits like that and I (or any number of other editors who you are warring against) will almost certainly raise the issue at AIV who generally take a dim view of such actions. Consider thyself non-template warned. Chaheel Riens (talk) 06:57, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

They attacked me first bitch.

Ok, can't say you weren't warned. I've brought this up at AIV. Chaheel Riens (talk) 07:05, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

There's no substatiable alibi for that. Ash Loomis (talk) 07:53, 12 February 2013 (UTC) I love you, no one ever wants me to say it but it's ture.[reply]

February 2013

Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing because it is believed to have been compromised. Note that edits to your user talk page might not indicate that you have regained control of your account. If your rights to e-mail and edit your user talk page have been revoked, contact ArbCom at arbcom-appeals-enlists.wikimedia.org. Yunshui 雲‍水 08:44, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Since it might be his younger brother messing with his computer again, and there is no reason to leave vulgar nonsense on the talk page, I removed the irrelevant obscene post. Dream Focus 15:42, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Devo may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

}}
*[[David Kendrick]] – drums <small>(1987–1991, live - 2003))</small>

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:10, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:44, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]