User talk:Asargana96
| This user is a student editor in University_of_British_Columbia/Women_in_the_Economy_(Winter_II) . |
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Asargana96, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Elysia and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.
I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.
Handouts
|
|---|
Additional Resources
|
|
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Elysia (Wiki Ed) (talk) 17:46, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
Your thread has been archived
[edit]
|
Hi Asargana96! You created a thread called Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing
|
Your thread has been archived
[edit]|
|
Hi Asargana96! You created a thread called Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing
|
Nomination of Check Yourself Screening Tool for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Check Yourself Screening Tool is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Check Yourself Screening Tool until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 02:54, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Copyright status of your Digital Empathy photo
[edit]Hey,
I just wanted to let you know that I nominated your image File:Photo-1531206715517-5c0ba140b2b8.jpg for deletion on Wikimedia Commons because I'm not convinced that you created the image since I ran a reverse image search on it and found results of it being posted as early as November 2018. The discussion is here.
If you did create the image, please provide proof of such in the discussion. If you did not create the image, I must inform you that lying about that on Commons is not looked upon favorably and that you should refrain from doing so in the future, and further that you must provide evidence that the image is freely-sourced, as fair-use (i.e., copyrighted) images are not allowed on Commons (note that being free of charge does not necessarily mean that it's free to use for our purposes). If it is copyrighted, then you are free to upload it to only the English Wikipedia after you've read our policy on uploading copyrighted images and feel that it satisfies the requirements of fair use.
I'm sorry if I seem harsh with this, but the Wikimedia Foundation takes copyright very seriously. This is not to say that your contributions aren't valuable – copyright can sometimes be very complicated and tricky, and many new users fall victim to it – but proper knowledge of our image policy is needed to upload photos here. Also, the current name of that image is not acceptable for Wikipedia's purposes; if you think that the image is suitable after all I can help you come up with a better title such as "people-pitching-in.jpg". I hope you have a good day!
– John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 02:35, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for creating this article. However, I'm afraid that I have to point out that it is written like a term paper and/or synthesis in your own words of material harvested from the many sources. Please see WP:OR. The page is already tagged for your attention so could you please address the style, tone, and content. If you are unable to do this, either I or another member of the GOCE will re-write it to be more compliant as an encyclopedic article, but this may well reduce its size by up to two thirds, and it may little resemble your original work. If you have any questions, don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 06:36, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of Digital empathy for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Digital empathy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Digital empathy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 07:02, 15 September 2019 (UTC)