User talk:Arunpnair

Image tagging for Image:Mazza.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Mazza.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:08, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:Selita Ebanks.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Selita Ebanks1.jpg. The copy called Image:Selita Ebanks1.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 10:02, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Valeria_Mazza.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Valeria_Mazza.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:01, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

November 2008

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Anti-Christian violence in India, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. -- Tinu Cherian - 12:06, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please see my Talk Page. This is a usual modus-operandi with this group of POV editors and Admins. This is mere bullying and coercion to let them carry out their petty agenda of anti-Indian propaganda to incite sympathy of Christian donors abroad. They aim at donations. A fake picture of a girl from All India Christian Council is used ala My Lai of Vietnam, in all these 'anti-Christian' pages against India. They say the pic is from Reuters. Have they obtained permission from Reuters? There are motivated Admins to help them on. The list of Admins who regularly edit away and block NPOVs in ‘anti-Christian’ pages may be perused. The casualty is Wiki reputation. The large number of anti-Indian articles by these POVs is frivolous. The language is poor and the data despicable. Sentences are merely pasted in from Missionary sites. This is an Encyclopedia! If the WP administration does not step in, WP will lose its face among one-sixth of humanity that make up India's population. I understand that I would now be blocked for calling a spade a spade. Some colluding Admin would block me. An example of their credentials is Googlean who was in the forefront of this commercial agenda. He has now been blocked for being a sock. Tinu Cherian's page bears accolades from this sock. Vvarkey seems to be another sock. I am no sock of Job Xavier, whose contributions I shall now study to see why he is disliked or feared by the likes of Tinu Cherian. Purkunna (talk) 18:49, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Jobxavier , Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Jobxavier. Stop Trolling, Job ! ! . Your username is a combination of Pur and Kunna which is a slang for male & female reproductive organs in malayalam. How mean and dirty. Just like your previous usernames like Horny priests, Nuns skirt upped, Jesus onthecross I see that you have been already blocked by a CU admin as a sock of Jobxavier. 08:02, 2 December 2008 Nishkid64 (Talk | contribs) blocked Purkunna (Talk | contribs) (account creation blocked) with an expiry time of indefinite ‎ (Abusing multiple accounts: Jobxavier.) . I request you to not to continue your POV pushing through scores of your socks again. I am really fed up. We have better business in wikipedia to do. -- Tinu Cherian - 04:56, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]