User talk:Arunkhatwani1

Welcome!

Hello, Arunkhatwani1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Arun khatwani, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 10:11, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

October 2010

You should wait for others to write an article about subjects in which you are personally involved, instead of writing it yourself, as you did at Arunkhatwani. This applies to articles about you, your achievements, your band, your business, your publications, your website, your relatives, and any other possible conflict of interest.

Creating an article about yourself is strongly discouraged. If you create such an article, it might be listed on articles for deletion. Deletion is not certain, but many feel strongly that you should not start articles about yourself. This is because independent creation encourages independent validation of both significance and verifiability. All edits to articles must conform to Wikipedia:No original research, Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, and Wikipedia:Verifiability.

If you are not "notable" under Wikipedia guidelines, creating an article about yourself may violate the policy that Wikipedia is not a personal webspace provider and would thus qualify for speedy deletion. If your achievements, etc., are verifiable and genuinely notable, and thus suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later. (See Wikipedia:Wikipedians with articles.) Thank you. - Happysailor 08:55, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

October 2010

Hello! Arun khatwani is not the appropriate place to post information about yourself, because it is in the part of Wikipedia where encyclopedic articles are written. A "userpage" at User:Arunkhatwani1, however, is available for personal information about yourself. When adding personal information please remember that Wikipedia is not a social network such as MySpace or Facebook. Your userpage is for anything that is compatible with the Wikipedia project. It is a mistake to think of it as a homepage: Wikipedia is not a blog, webspace provider, or social networking site. Please see Wikipedia:Introduction and Wikipedia:User page for more information. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 10:11, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Removing Speedy at Arun khatwani

Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles you created, as you did with Arun khatwani. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please do the following:

Place {{hangon}} on the page. Please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag(s).
Make your case on the article's talk page.

Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 10:16, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there Arunkhatwani1! I saw that you added a {{hangon}} tag to a page which you created, Arun khatwani. This is good, but in the process you removed the tag requesting deletion under CSD A7. Even though there is a hangon on the page, the deletion template should remain there. But don't worry, this doesn't mean that the page is going to get deleted. Make sure you edit the talk page of the page nominated for deletion, located at Talk:Arun khatwani, administrators will look at your reason why the page should remain before they decide what to do. Thanks - SDPatrolBot (talk) 10:19, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with Arun khatwani. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 10:32, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with Arun khatwani. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 10:37, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been temporarily blocked because it is suspected to be a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not.

IIf you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Alexandr Dmitri (talk) 10:41, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Arunkhatwani1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

IT WAS A MISTAKE

Decline reason:

This is precisely the same unblock reason you tried on your original account. What precisely is a mistake? That you are sockpuppet? You have repeatedly recreated exactly the same page, with exactly the same content. Then you make the same unblock requests. Oh, and this account's name is virtually identical to User:Arunkhatwani, with the addition of the number 1. Alexandr Dmitri (talk) 10:51, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock My Account

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Emraanhashmi for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Chzz ► 09:39, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]