Jump to content

User talk:Aruegger

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Northamerica1000(talk) 01:57, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome!

[edit]
Sorry for the belated welcome, but the cookies are still warm!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Aruegger. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Northamerica1000(talk) 20:45, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Reply at my talk page

[edit]
Hello, Aruegger. You have new messages at Northamerica1000's talk page.
Message added 20:45, 11 December 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Re: Your message on my talk page

[edit]

I'm copy/pasting your question from my talk page and my response from there to here, because my reply on my talk page will eventually be auto-archived, and I wouldn't want you to miss it.

Your comments

[edit]

Hello I tried to create and submit a article on Pelco Inc or Pelco by Schneider Electric now.. (www.pelco.com). I realize the importance of primary source documents to ensure there is no manipulation of information or false information posted on the most accurate encyclopedia ever made! I have tried since my initial submission to find more reliable sources but I am uncertain if they meet your criteria even after reviewing the rules provided. For example this news website: http://www.fresnobee.com/2010/10/31/2139523/clovis-based-pelco-to-take-on.html talks about the integration of Pelco to Schneider (Is this site worthy of citation?) In college this would not fly as a primary source or reliable source for the majority papers I would write. Conversely, there is almost no physical literature, .edu's or .org's with information about Pelco's early history, and a lot of questionable content out there describing Pelco's more recent history. From what I read, Wikipedia also prefers not to have many sources from the company's website to help prevent advertisement/business oriented pages..So I tried to stay away from using their content, but I'm at a loss as to where to find more reliable content on Pelco than their actual website. Any suggestions / advice would help very helpful. I would like to create this page because I've been in the security camera business for awhile, I feel like Pelco has been a big part of the american security industry and that the brand will die out sooner than later and I think its worthwhile information. All advise / suggestions would be great, Thank you! Aruegger (talk) 15:07, 11 December 2012 (UTC) Andrew[reply]

My response

[edit]
  • Hello Aruegger. Primary sources are usable to verify information in articles, but independent third-party secondary sources are the standard for building Wikipedia articles. See also: WP:42. Company-produced information, such as press releases and PR are typically considered primary sources. The Fresno Bee article you provided above is a fine usable secondary source. A great place to start in finding sources is Google News archive and Google Books. Check out these search links, and note that by removing the quotation marks and changing the criteria in the search box around on the resulting pages, additional results can often be yielded:
Here are some secondary sources I found after some source searching:
— Hope this helps out! Northamerica1000(talk) 04:34, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo
Hello! Aruegger, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! 
I, and the rest of the hosts, would be more than happy to answer any questions you have! SarahStierch (talk) 22:51, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Kevin Rutherford (talk) 00:23, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Please help me :(

[edit]

Category:Please help me :(, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. -- Cheers, Riley 20:51, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have pasted, below, the note left on the deleted category page. – Fayenatic London 10:36, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Help me

[edit]

I have spoken with a few Wikipedia monitors and I can still not get my page live due to the sources I use: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Pelco

One monitor listed specific references that were acceptable for my content, I reviewed them and they validate the content of my article. I read through the new contributors guide, the golden rule, and reliable source guide and I'm frankly at a loss for what exactly it is I need to do to get my article live. Please provide as many suggestions as you can so I can properly do this, I'm not intentionally re-submitting just for the hell of it. I can't tell if some of the sources I have listed are being red flagged or if I don't have enough valid sources, or perhaps even what section of my article is not supported by the sources I have as citations. Please provide direction. Thank you! – User:Aruegger 18:03, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Firstly, the only sources that satisfy Wikipedia's standards for reliable, independent sources seem to be the Fresno Bee and maybe CE Pro - the others seem to originate from Pelco itself. Furthermore, the article's content doesn't really have much to do with what the sources say about the company: An article about massive layoffs and a transfer of manufacturing to China is turned into a source for claims about "a comprehensive collection of innovative high-tech security and surveillance products" - it doesn't say that at all. And sourcing claims about Pelco's greatness to Pelco itself is hardly convincing. Huon (talk) 22:17, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I've copied your comments to my talk page, and I've replied there. When you want to contact other editors, please do so by directly editing their talk pages (there's a "new section" tab near the top of the page), not by creating a category. Categories are meant to help sort articles, not for communication between users. Huon (talk) 22:43, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Pelco concern

[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Pelco, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:02, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Pelco

[edit]

Hello Aruegger. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Pelco".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Pelco}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 02:01, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Aruegger&oldid=1088371121"