User talk:ArtourRakhimov

Edit warring at Buteyko method

Your recent editing history at Buteyko method shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Note especially BRD above. Do not attempt to force your version. Discuss until a consensus is reached. Failure to do so is edit warring and you may be blocked. -- Brangifer (talk) 15:38, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, ArtourRakhimov. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Buteyko method, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Yobol (talk) 16:27, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Distortion of reality has nothing to do with "Managing a conflict of interest"

Dear Yobol, exact sciences and rules of Wikipedia require to provide clinical evidence to the bold statement that are currently present on Buteyko Wiki page. This statement is "However, this theory is not widely supported in the medical community due to the lack of evidence supporting either the theory behind the method ..." We need to provide clinical references that hyperventilation is not a norm in chronic disease. Without these references, such statements are unfounded. When the opposite evidence is present ("overbreathing is a norm in disease") and ignored, making such statements represent fraud (wrongful deception intended to result in financial or personal gain). Thus, let us stick to facts and ules of good conduct. ARakhimov 07:10, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 07:31, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]