User talk:Artoffuge
Welcome
[edit]Welcome
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions seem to be advertising or for promotional purposes. Wikipedia does not allow advertising. For more information on this, see:
- Policy on neutral point of view
- Guideline on spam
- Guideline on external links
- Guideline on conflict of interest
If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write {{helpme}} below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page and how to develop articles
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- Article wizard for creating new articles
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! SarekOfVulcan (talk) 12:06, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
Talkback
[edit]Message added 12:19, 10 August 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
August 2010
[edit]Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Thank you. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 12:45, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Ástor Piazzolla, you may be blocked from editing. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 12:53, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits.
The next time you use Wikipedia for advertising, as you did with George Gershwin, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 12:56, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
{{unblock|Your reason here}}
, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 13:01, 10 August 2010 (UTC)Artoffuge (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I understand that some of my edits can be seen as promotional. But not all of them. I now better understand the policies and I request that my recent edits will be reviewed and restored if seen fit
Decline reason:
Doesn't look to me that you made any non-advertising related edits on the 10th. The valid edits from the 6th appear to still be in place. That said, you don't appear to be requesting unblock just a reinstatement of your edits so this has been declined. Syrthiss (talk) 13:57, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
{{unblock|Your reason here}}
, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 18:24, 11 August 2010 (UTC)The article Shadowy Arcade has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Notability. I am unable to find any reliable, independent sources online, although there is a wealth of PR material put out by the artist, including, it appears, this article.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Danger (talk) 08:13, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
October 2013
[edit]Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Mehmet Okonsar may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- * J.[[Joseph Haydn|HAYDN]]: Last four piano sonatas] (piano)
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:02, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
August 2014
[edit]Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Mehmet Okonsar may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- '''David Ezra Okonşar''' (pronounced Okonschar) (born 20 October 1961, [[Istanbul]] is a Turkish-Belgian ([[double nationality]]) pianist, composer,
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:37, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
Removing AfD template
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Mehmet Okonsar. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—cyberbot I NotifyOnline 21:21, 31 August 2014 (UTC)