User talk:Artistic-mind

enter information at your own risk

Sockpuppetry investigation

This is a crazy suggestion that I am a sock puppet for Bischof-Ralph. I am very let down by these false accusations. I am a user who enjoys reading and editing articles. Please rethink your accusations. As far as Bischof -Ralph, I read the history of the complaints and its obvious that someone who doesnt like him is using wikipedia to attack him . People are more gulable then i thought... very sad... praying for all the lost and confused. --Artistic-mind (talk) 14:06, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cologne Cathedral

Thanks for the addition re the High alatr. I have moved the info down to the "Treasures" section. Amandajm (talk) 12:19, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, No. I have seen very little of Germany. I stayed for a few days in Konstanz with relatives of my husband. The dear man knew that were involved in heritage restoration and took us around to all the lovliest churches in that area. Birnau was the highlight. My usual areas of operation are Italian Renaissance art and architecture and English Medieval architecture and stained glass. I had a friend called Celi who was born in Cologne and migrated to Australia after the war. I remember her sitting there on the wide verandah of an Australian country homestead which they shared with two other migrant families (and where we had parties that raged all night,) looking out into the pitch blackness of the alien forest that surrounded the house and up at the unfamiliar blaze of the Milky Way (which is more intense in the Southern Hemisphere), and singing German Lieder. It was one of the most magical experience of my childhood. I couldn't understand the words, but the poignancy of the meaning was apparent. I maintain the Cologne Cathedral page in memory of Celi, a most gracious and beautiful person. Amandajm (talk) 06:32, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sock puppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet. (blocked by –MuZemike 20:07, 10 February 2010 (UTC))[reply]
You may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but please read our guide to appealing blocks first.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Artistic-mind (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This action against me is a total misunderunderstanding. There is NO possibility that I am Bischof Ralphs sock puppet. Common American Rule- Innocent until proven guilty... 1. Bischof Ralph is native German, I am native American. His English sucks... My english is far better then his...(thats because its my mother language) 2. I dont even know where Bischof Ralph lives, but its not any where near me. you did not check IP address.. if you did there is no way you would believe I am Bischof Ralph. But you have my IP address. so check it and do the right thing by adding a nice sweet person back on wikipedia to work on Articles. 3) I edited articles and added information with sources and proof. I didnt vandalise or insert nonsense or false information. what is it that I am at fault of doing? 4) I am interested in working on many articles. I started with Cologne Cathedral and Bishop Seiwert-fleige. I noticed that some users wanted to delete this article while others wanted to keep it and have it edited Some people find it interesting and notable, and others dont... A Bishop who already is mentioned on at least 4 other articles in English Wikipedia and also in the German, Italian and Spanish WIkipedia should have his OWN article.

Decline reason:

From what I can read at the SPI, even if it's not sockpuppetry it is certainly meatpuppetry, which is just as bad and just as sanctionable: "A new user who engages in the same behavior as another user in the same context, and who appears to be editing Wikipedia solely for that purpose, may be subject to the remedies applied to the user whose behavior they are joining." In any case, the behavioral analysis of the case makes a Checkuser unnecessary. —Jeremy ^{(v^_^v Boribori!)} 10:06, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Artistic-mind (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The only behavior I joined was editing articles ,giving sources and proof for all of the information I added. What EXACTL^Y is my bad behavior? What I did was good work for wikipedia. Does good work become bad work because it might be related to somebody else that is not welcomed here? And since many others edited these articles also,then this cant be a bad thing.Please tell me speciffically where I did something bad or unblock me. I am not here to cause trouble... I am here to help edit.

Decline reason:

It is clear to me that you are the same person, even though you claim that you are not, using the same writing style with which you claimed you were not the same person on another account. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 22:03, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.