User talk:Articleye

Welcome

Hello, Articleye, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! I am One of Many (talk) 07:31, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility

Tulsidas

Thanks for your reviews. I have addressed your comment at Tulsidas. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 04:54, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Karma in Jainism

Thanks for your review and comments. I have tried to address your concerns. Since I have rewritten this article and am the major contributor, I thought that I will be in a position to satisfy your concerns.--Indian Chronicles (talk) 15:17, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Some comments have come on the notice board. But still not clear how to go about it. I am thinking maybe I should delete this section or make a cursory mention of 2 or 3 sentences. Please suggest your views.--Indian Chronicles (talk) 07:25, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dropping the section is fine. We just need to make sure that per WP:WEIGHT, we are giving more coverage to the majority viewpoint (2 of 3 sentences). Also the sources we use on the topic should be from:

* Text books used in top academic programs on the subject or

* Journals/conference proceedings that are peer reviewed

* Other sources that fit the WP:RS criteria for reliable sources.

Someone may choose to expand the section in the future (and that may be good for the article). They just need to stick to the weight and source reliability policies. If you feel you can expand it now within these constraints in a weeks time or so, you are welcome to do so. Otherwise turncating is fine. Articleye (talk) 05:33, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delisted

Thanks for volunteering to take on the review of the TM article. I have just delisted the article since editors feel more work could be done. (olive (talk) 18:01, 30 January 2013 (UTC))[reply]

Spanish Civil War

Hi Artcileye. I was wondering if you had made a decision regarding the Talk:Spanish Civil War/GA2 reassessment. AIRcorn (talk) 22:58, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I haven't had the time to complete the review. I suggest you open it up for community review rather than an individual review as I am unlikely to find time in the near future. Articleye (talk) 12:09, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Karma in Jainism

Hello, I left a query at the talk page of the article Karma in Jainism. Its this one: Talk:Karma_in_Jainism#Citation_needed_tags_on_material_theory_section.3F. If possible, please reply to it. Rahul Jain (talk) 04:48, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022 Good Article Nominations backlog drive

Good article nominations \| June 2022 Backlog Drive
On 1 June, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number and age of articles reviewed. Interested in taking part? Sign up here!
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 5+ good article reviews or participated in previous backlog drives. Click here to opt out of any future messages. (t · c) buidhe 04:26, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]