User talk:Arthur B

Image copyright problem with Image:Gohar2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Gohar2.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:32, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Walter Stace

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Walter Stace, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from http://etcweb.princeton.edu/CampusWWW/Companion/stace_walter.html, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL), you can comment to that effect on Talk:Walter Stace. Then you should do one of the following:

Make a note on the original website that re-use is permitted under the GFDL and state at Talk:Walter Stace where we can find that note; or
Send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL.

It is also important that the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and that it follows Wikipedia article layout. For more information, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Metros232 12:02, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've merged the content you put at Walter Stace into the Walter Terence Stace page. Hope that's OK. Dsp13 12:23, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Dsp13. Sorry for not noticing your msg earlier.

User:Arthur_B 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Hamed Gohar

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Hamed Gohar, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from http://www.frcu.eun.eg/www/scieland/gohar/Gohar.htm, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL), you can comment to that effect on Talk:Hamed Gohar. Then you should do one of the following:

Make a note on the original website that re-use is permitted under the GFDL and state at Talk:Hamed Gohar where we can find that note; or
Send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL.

It is also important that the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and that it follows Wikipedia article layout. For more information, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Metros232 12:04, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Red Book (Jung)

I have nominated Red Book (Jung), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Red Book (Jung). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. RadioFan (talk) 11:31, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A question and a wish

As a reader of Borges, I wonder if you have ever read any of Schopenhauer's works? That was my question. My wish is that RadioFan will fail in his or her attempt to delete the Red Book article. It looks like an interesting article and it is a good start. Other Wikipedia contributors who are interested in the topic will probably be glad to expand the article.Lestrade (talk) 18:04, 3 July 2009 (UTC)Lestrade[reply]

Hello Lestrade, First of all I would like to thank you for your care and message. Sure I know (fairly) about Schopenhauer but I didn't read his book yet. You will find alot of Takfiri books here in Egypt sold practically everywhere but you will not find Schopenhauer's book, the vendor won't know who the guy is and if he somehow does, he wouldn't think highly of you. Still i defy this stupid sensorship (which is supported by the people, not the government, and that's what makes it really sad) and buy used books from Amazon. I was about to order The world as will and representation and that's why i was very glad to recieve your message. I can buy only one volume so would you suggest I or II ? Radiofan has already withdrawn his request to delete the article after realizing it's notable. I have the link in my watch list so there is no need to worry.

Since you are into Borges, I thought you would like to read something that i wrote and perhaps (who knows) help me publish it. will you give me your email so that i can send the doc?

Best Wishes Arthur

If you want to read The World as Will and Representation, start with Volume I. Please be aware of the fact that it has had a strong effect on several people (Tolstoy, Nietzsche, Wittgenstein, and others of importance) and it may affect your life, especially if you are interested in Buddhism. Volume II is full of many important passages, so it is worth reading, but only after you have read Volume I. I would like to read your essay on Borges, but can you post an e-mail address here so that I can communicate with you outside of Wikipedia?Lestrade (talk) 01:19, 4 July 2009 (UTC)Lestrade[reply]

Biased Arabic Wikipedia Template

FYI, discussion about deleting it. Thanks. --Ⲗⲁⲛⲧⲉⲣⲛⲓⲝ ^[talk] 13:16, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Biased Arabic Wikipedia Template

Hello! I am requesting a re-evaluation of the unfounded deletion of my personal space page about Arabic Wikipedia template. The request for re-evaluation can be found here. I would greatly appreciate your input in this matter. Thank you in advance. --λⲁⲛτερⲛιξ ^[talk] 00:41, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

Thank you very much Arthur! Your words mean a lot to me! If you could provide me with the links to these 2 templates on Arabic Wiki, I would be very grateful. Thanks again brother :) --λⲁⲛτερⲛιξ ^[talk] 18:01, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Europe 10,000 Challenge invite

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 02:21, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nicholas Kalmakoff has been accepted

Nicholas Kalmakoff, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 14:08, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pazuzu Algarad moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Pazuzu Algarad, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Ambrosiawater (talk) 05:40, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pazuzu Algarad has been accepted

Pazuzu Algarad, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

– robertsky (talk) 03:29, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]