User talk:Artemisse

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Great Pyramid of Giza, are considered vandalism and are immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. ~ Riana ⁂ 07:09, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kindly make your arguments at Talk:Great Pyramid of Giza before making any additional edits to the page. Thank you. – Luna Santin (talk) 07:21, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you do not respond to this message, I will be forced to block you from editing. Please respond. Thank you. – Luna Santin (talk) 07:23, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can you say the word "collaboration"? Your edits in all of the previous account incarnations have been intent on reverting to a one-sided view of dating, which also includes other broken things such as broken picture links and references in the wrong place. Removing cited current thought and their cites to revert to the same single opinion view over and over and over and over will be endlessly reverted and get you blocked. You could try discussing on the talk page for inclusion of the one view you appear to greatly wish to have as the only one, but I doubt you will ever find consensus to revert to that one view, even should those theories be proved without a shadow of doubt, the previous ideas would still be there. Please either stop making reverts to "The only version that's right" and start to collaborate and edit towards a greater coverage or desist.--Alf ^melmac 07:38, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. --Ronz 16:44, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Artemisse for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. IPSOS (talk) 17:09, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]