User talk:ArtHistoryHistoiredelart

This is ArtHistoryHistoiredelart's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ruth Rachel Anderson-Avraham (January 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eagleash was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ruth Rachel Anderson-Avraham and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ruth Rachel Anderson-Avraham, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Eagleash (talk) 11:50, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ArtHistoryHistoiredelart! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Eagleash (talk) 11:50, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yvonne Michele Anderson (January 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This is not the correct place to request new redirects. Please follow the instructions at Articles for creation/Wizard-Redirects. Thank you.

This appears to be a duplicate of another submission, Ruth Rachel Yvonne Anderson-Avraham, which is also waiting to be reviewed. To save time we will consider the other submission and not this one.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Yvonne Michele Anderson and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Yvonne Michele Anderson, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 19:41, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Ruth Rachel Yvonne Anderson-Avraham

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Ruth Rachel Yvonne Anderson-Avraham, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Tymon.r Do you have any questions? 01:29, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ruth Rachel Yvonne Anderson-Avraham (February 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ruth Rachel Yvonne Anderson-Avraham and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ruth Rachel Yvonne Anderson-Avraham, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 05:21, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ruth Rachel Anderson-Avraham

Hello, ArtHistoryHistoiredelart. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ruth Rachel Anderson-Avraham".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 07:05, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmation of Draft Page Removal, 16 July 2020

@UnitedStatesian: Thank you for removing the Draft page "Ruth Rachel Anderson-Avraham" from Wikipedia. At this time, we believe that there is a more welcoming and appropriate forum in which to record her contributions to society, and the contributions to society of other women like her. ArtHistoryHistoiredelart (talk) 04:12, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Yvonne Michele Anderson

Hello, ArtHistoryHistoiredelart. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Yvonne Michele Anderson".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 20:37, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmation of Draft Page Removal, 16 July 2020

@Lapablo: Thank you for removing "Draft:Yvonne Michele Anderson" from Wikipedia. At this time, we believe that there is a more welcoming and appropriate forum in which to record her contributions to society, and the contributions to society of other women like her. ArtHistoryHistoiredelart (talk) 04:16, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ruth Rachel Yvonne Anderson-Avraham

Hello, ArtHistoryHistoiredelart. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ruth Rachel Yvonne Anderson-Avraham".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 06:09, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for letting us know, UnitedStatsian.

Unfortunately, the article in question, "Ruth Rachel Yvonne Anderson-Avraham", has already been deleted, but we have now formally requested undeletion.

Your business contributions to Wikipedia look fascinating. We'll have to take a closer look sometime.

Have a Happy Holiday Season. Be safe and well. ArtHistoryHistoiredelart (talk) 17:17, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]