User talk:Arskwad

April 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Testament (Xenosaga), did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Testament (Xenosaga) was changed by Arskwad (u) (t) deleting 28904 characters on 2010-04-22T15:55:56+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 15:55, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Muir Skate AfD

The sources were on the AfD page. Since it's apparently too long for you to read, here are the sources. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] PÆon (talk) 21:53, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

i dont appreciate your sarcasm. i saw the sources but local sources like college newspapers are not reliable... most people agree.. you obviously care a lot about the topic and i know it sucks to see stuff deleted... just keep your eye out for news sources that are more reputable... and sometimes it's hard to create a new article but it is much more easy to expand an article on a similar topic... maybe you can fit it there.. Arskwad (talk) 03:51, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Soliciting your input

Hi. There's an attempt to bring the History of Spider-Man article, which needs enormous work, up to encyclopedic standards. You were among the editors in the deletion discussion, and it'd be good to get your input on, and edits to, the work-in-progress at User:Spidey104/Fictional history of Spider-Man sandbox. With regards, --Tenebrae (talk) 05:06, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

i wish i knew how to help... I am not an expert on spiderman although i obbiously know what the avg person knows. if you run into any debates and need a third opinion feel free to contact me... thanks for takign this onArskwad (talk) 01:32, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD

FYI -- I've improved the article at the AfD here. Best.--Epeefleche (talk) 20:20, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Additional comments needed

Following a month-long process of multiple editors to have "Fictional history of Spider-Man" conform to Wikipedia:Manual of Style (writing about fiction), one editor has objected and wishes for the article, which has been the subject of three deletion discussions, to remain as is.

Alternately, the proposed new version appears at User:Spidey104/Fictional history of Spider-Man sandbox.

Your input, as an editor involved in the deletion discussion, is invited at Talk:Fictional history of Spider-Man#Rewrite and replacement. --

thanks! i want everyone to participate because even if there is no consensus to merge there is definitely consensus for a cleanup...Arskwad (talk) 04:25, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. It's very nice to see someone new to Wikipedia who already shows a collegiality and civility that often takes a while to learn. Glad to have you aboard! --Tenebrae (talk) 17:15, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]