User talk:ArsenalAtletico2017

Welcome!

Hello, ArsenalAtletico2017, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 17:41, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Biografer: OK, I will note it. -- ArsenalAtletico2017 (talk) 10:01, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Didube (district)

Hi, I'm Boleyn. ArsenalAtletico2017, thanks for creating Didube (district)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add your references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 20:43, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Battle of Tbilisi (1921)

Hi, I'm Boleyn. ArsenalAtletico2017, thanks for creating Battle of Tbilisi (1921)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add references to all articles you create.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 21:05, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to join WikiProject Military history

Hello ArsenalAtletico2017! Thank you for your contributions to military history-related articles.

If you would be interested in joining a group of editors who are also working on military history topics, please take a look at the WikiProject Military history—we would be delighted to have you! If you like what you see, please add your username here, and a project coordinator will soon be along to welcome you. If you're not sure about joining, why not sign up to receive our monthly newsletter, The Bugle? It is a great way to get a feel for the project. Regards, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 06:05, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Milhist!

Hello ArsenalAtletico2017 and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.

A few features that you might find helpful:

Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
The announcement and open task box is updated very frequently. You can watchlist it if you are interested, or you can add it directly to your user page by copying the following: {{WPMILHIST Announcements}}.
Important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.
The project has several departments, which handle article quality assessment, detailed article and content review, writing contests, and article logistics.
We have a number of task forces that focus on specific topics, nations, periods, and conflicts.
We've developed a set of guidelines that cover article structure and content, template use, categorization, and many other issues of interest.
If you're looking for something to work on, there are many articles that need attention, as well as a number of review alerts.
If you would like to receive the project's monthly newsletter, The Bugle, please sign up here.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask any of the project coordinators or any other experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome, and we are looking forward to seeing you around! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 00:09, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Didube (district) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Didube (district), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Boleyn (talk) 14:17, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Battle of Tbilisi (1921)

Thanks for creating Battle of Tbilisi (1921).

A New Page Patroller Boleyn just tagged the page as having some issues to fix, and wrote this note for you:

Please work on this in draftspace.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can reply over here and ping me. Or, for broader editing help, you can talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 14:18, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Monadire moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Monadire, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Boleyn (talk) 14:19, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations now open for "Military historian of the year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" awards

Nominations for our annual Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards are open until 23:59 (GMT) on 15 December 2018. Why don't you nominate the editors who you believe have made a real difference to the project in 2018? MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:26, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve 2006 in Georgia (country)

Thanks for creating 2006 in Georgia (country).

A New Page Patroller Meatsgains just tagged the page as having some issues to fix, and wrote this note for you:

Consider providing reliable sources to strengthen the page's verifiability.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can reply over here and ping me. Or, for broader editing help, you can talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Meatsgains^(talk) 02:58, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Voting now open for "Military historian of the year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" awards

Voting for our annual Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards is open until 23:59 (GMT) on 30 December 2018. Why don't you vote for the editors who you believe have made a real difference to Wikipedia's coverage of military history in 2018? MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:16, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Battle of Choloki

Hello, ArsenalAtletico2017,

Welcome to Wikipedia and thanks for creating Battle of Choloki! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

This has been tagged for 2 issues.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 09:31, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Battle of Tbilisi (1921)

Hello, ArsenalAtletico2017. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Battle of Tbilisi".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. DannyS712 (talk) 08:25, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Round Table—Free Georgia

Hello, ArsenalAtletico2017,

Thanks for creating Round Table—Free Georgia! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Please add your references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 06:57, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Battle of Tbilisi(1921)

Hello, ArsenalAtletico2017. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Battle of Tbilisi".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CptViraj (📧) 12:00, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Didube (district)

Hello, ArsenalAtletico2017. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Didube".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CptViraj (📧) 12:01, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Monadire

Hello, ArsenalAtletico2017. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Monadire".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CptViraj (📧) 12:28, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Backlog Banzai

In the month of September, Wikiproject Military history is running a project-wide edit-a-thon, Backlog Banzai. There are heaps of different areas you can work on, for which you claim points, and at the end of the month all sorts of whiz-bang awards will be handed out. Every player wins a prize! There is even a bit of friendly competition built in for those that like that sort of thing. Sign up now at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/September 2019 Backlog Banzai to take part. For the coordinators, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:17, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:37, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced

G'day everyone, voting for the 2019 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 03:37, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election half-way mark

G'day everyone, the voting for the XIX Coordinator Tranche is at the halfway mark. The candidates have answered various questions, and you can check them out to see why they are running and decide whether you support them. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 07:36, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

And Then We Danced

Hello. Do not delete sourced information from articles without previous discussion. --Haasbur (talk) 12:08, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Also please provide sources that Ana Subeliani is a liberal activist. Currently all sources claim that she is a civil activist.--Haasbur (talk) 12:16, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

March Madness 2020

G'day all, March Madness 2020 is about to get underway, and there is bling aplenty for those who want to get stuck into the backlog by way of tagging, assessing, updating, adding or improving resources and creating articles. If you haven't already signed up to participate, why not? The more the merrier! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:19, 29 February 2020 (UTC) for the coord team[reply]

edit summaries

Hi - I reverted a couple of your edits on George Floyd protests because they didn't make sense to me. Just a note to please use edit summaries to explain your edits, especially on a fast-paced controversial article like this one, and not to mark edits that are about substantive content changes as minor. Thanks! If you'd like to discuss anything about the phrasing, I'm happy to use the article talk page. -- phoebe / (talk to me) 22:37, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, ArsenalAtletico2017. Thanks for you edits on George Floyd protests. However, you have in error marked several edits as minor when they are not. A good rule of thumb is that edits consisting solely of spelling corrections, formatting changes, or rearrangement of text without modification of content should be flagged as minor edits, and that everything else should not. Please read WP:MINOR for further information. Banak (talk) 22:53, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

American politics discretionary sanctions notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 19:00, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits at George Floyd protests

Hi ArsenalAtletico2017. Please do not change named references in articles, as you did here on George Floyd protests. That reference was used multiple times in the article. The reference you used did not support the other statements. gobonobo ⁺ ^c 19:16, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

Hello, I'm Locke Cole. I noticed that you recently removed content from George Floyd protests without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. —Locke Cole • t • c 22:15, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

Your addition to George Floyd protests has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 15:00, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at Killing of George Floyd. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —Cryptic 23:46, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Where can I find for how much time I am blocked? ArsenalAtletico2017 (talk) 00:00, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's 24 hours, as shown in your block log. This should have shown up in the notice above also, but I typoed the template, sorry. —Cryptic 00:03, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Killing of George Floyd does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Love of Corey (talk) 01:03, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to George Floyd protests has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 12:52, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Which addition? ArsenalAtletico2017 (talk) 13:12, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for not replying. I did not know you had asked a question. Content was copied from CNN. Here is a link to the bot report. Click on the iThenticate link to view what the bot found.— Diannaa (talk) 15:15, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

O3000 (talk) 00:38, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:03, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced

G'day everyone, voting for the 2020 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2020. Thanks from the outgoing coord team, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 05:17, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:53, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the 2020 Military history WikiProject Newcomer and Historian of the Year awards now open

G'day all, the nominations for the 2020 Military history WikiProject newcomer and Historian of the Year are open, all editors are encouraged to nominate candidates for the awards before until 23:59 (GMT) on 15 December 2020, after which voting will occur for 14 days. There is not much time left to nominate worthy recipients, so get to it! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 06:45, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for "Military Historian of the Year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" closing

G'day all, voting for the WikiProject Military history "Military Historian of the Year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" is about to close, so if you haven't already, click on the links and have your say before 23:59 (GMT) on 30 December! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 23:34, 28 December 2020 (UTC) for the coord team[reply]

January 2021

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Derek Chauvin, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. "American" does not need linking per MOS:OVERLINK, and "USA" is not used per MOS:USA. —Bagumba (talk) 17:20, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2018 Georgian presidential election, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page History of Georgia. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:30, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Balkans and Eastern Europe discretionary sanctions alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in Eastern Europe or the Balkans. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

After looking over some of your edits, I would encourage you to be more observant of Wikipedia:Verifiability. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:37, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive

Hey y'all, the April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive begins at 00:01 UTC on April 1, 2021 and runs through 23:59 UTC on April 31, 2021. Points can be earned through reviewing articles on the AutoCheck report, reviewing articles listed at WP:MILHIST/ASSESS, reviewing MILHIST-tagged articles at WP:GAN or WP:FAC, and reviewing articles submitted at WP:MILHIST/ACR. Service awards and barnstars are given for set points thresholds, and the top three finishers will receive further awards. To participate, sign up at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Military_History/April 2021 Reviewing Drive#Participants and create a worklist at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/April 2021 Reviewing Drive/Worklists (examples are given). Further details can be found at the drive page. Questions can be asked at the drive talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:22, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2021 Tbilisi Pride Protests, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Western values.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:53, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2021 Tbilisi Pride protests, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Britain.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2021 Tbilisi Pride protests, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Government of Georgia and United National Movement.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:58, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nomination period closing soon

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are still open, but not for long. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! No further nominations will be accepted after that time. Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:42, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Military history coordinator election voting has commenced

Hey y'all, voting for the 2021 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2021. Voting will be conducted at the 2021 tranche page itself. Appropriate questions for the candidates can also be asked. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:38, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election voting period closing soon

Hey y'all, voting for the 2021 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche will be closing soon. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2021. Voting will be conducted at the 2021 tranche page itself. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:31, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tbilisi City Assembly, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page United National Movement.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Imperium: The Philosophy of History and Politics, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Samuel Huntington and Cant.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Survey about History on Wikipedia

I am Petros Apostolopoulos, a Ph.D. candidate in Public History at North Carolina State University. My Ph.D. project examines how historical knowledge is produced on Wikipedia. If you are interested in participating in my research study by offering your own experience of writing about history on Wikipedia, you can click on this link https://ncsu.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_9z4wmR1cIp0qBH8. There are minimal risks involved in this research.

If you have any questions, please let me know. Petros Apostolopoulos, paposto@ncsu.edu Apolo1991 (talk) 10:52, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Imperium: The Philosophy of History and Politics, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Class war.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021

Your edit to Gldani prison scandal has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 15:12, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2021 Tbilisi Pride protests, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dickhead.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive editing on Imperium: The Philosophy of History and Politics

Howdy! Your recent manual reverts of my edits on the page Imperium: The Philosophy of History and Politics are in violation of Wikipedia's WP:3RR guidelines. You seem to have intentionally laid out those manual reverts in a manner that would not be automatically detected. Please do not continue engaging in edit-warring or WP:OWN behavior, especially when you've avoided further discussing article matters on the related talk page and instead have resorted to undoing my work without any deliberation. Mewnst (talk) 23:22, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Irakli Garibashvili, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Constitution of Georgia.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Imperium: The Philosophy of History and Politics. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 15:34, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not insert fringe or undue weight content into articles, as you did to Imperium: The Philosophy of History and Politics. An article should not give undue weight to any aspects of the subject but should strive to treat each aspect with a weight appropriate to its significance to the subject. Please use the article's talk page to discuss the material and its appropriate weight within the article. Thank you. Llll5032 (talk) 03:53, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive editing on Francis Parker Yockey

Your edits to the page on Francis Parker Yockey are most usually plagued with novel synthesis and pushing a non-neutral point of view. Most of your edits on the various views of Yockey reside in the lede of the article, which is undue. In this edit, you removed a citation for Yockey's fascist affinities because it was "dead," and subsequently removed that content from the lede, instead of doing the simple thing and adding an archive link (which I have since done). Your other edits pushed to depict Yockey as some sort of communist or lefty sympathizer based on his early political development and his beliefs that Russia was an antisemitic ally. That's an egregious work of synthesis that Yockey's own writings don't support. In Yockey's page, and in the related Imperium page, you've made a game of undoing or misleadingly amending the work of other editors that mention Yockey's antisemitism (as seen here and in other edits). Stop trying to WP:OWN these pages. I am not the only person to bring up these issues with your edits. Please stop disruptively editing Wikipedia. Mewnst (talk) 18:27, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Llll5032 (talk) 02:47, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on The Enemy of Europe. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 16:12, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Llll5032. I noticed that you recently made an edit to The Enemy of Europe in which your edit summary misstated the change you made after a talk page disagreement about length (adding almost 200 words, not "Approximately 100"). Please describe your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. Thanks. Llll5032 (talk) 19:39, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Firefangledfeathers. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Cultural Marxism that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Do not label good faith edits vandalism (see WP:NORESVAND). Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 18:16, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Firefangledfeathers: Wikipedia does have a rule against vandalism, which I was referring to. So nothing to do with a "personal attack".ArsenalAtletico2017 (talk) 19:46, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in Eastern Europe or the Balkans. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

I see that you've been informed before, but these need to be updated on a yearly basis. Please understand that nothing about this alert implies wrongdoing on your part. Generalrelative (talk) 22:39, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:ArsenalAtletico2017 reported by User:Firefangledfeathers (Result: ). Thank you. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 18:24, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at The Enemy of Europe

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Per a complaint at the noticeboard. EdJohnston (talk) 15:43, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Personal attack in edit summary at Cultural Marxism conspiracy theory

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use inappropriate or abusive edit summaries, as you did at Cultural Marxism conspiracy theory, you may be blocked from editing.

Here is the diff: [1]. Generalrelative (talk) 19:39, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Generalrelative: Wikipedia does have a rule against vandalism, which I was referring to. So nothing to do with a "personal attack".ArsenalAtletico2017 (talk) 19:46, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It sure does. And as Firefangledfeathers pointed out to you in their edit summary when reverting you, the material you cut was not vandalism, which means that calling it that is indeed a personal attack [2]. Generalrelative (talk) 19:58, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you say “ Looks like I would probably have to create new account anyway.”

. Doug Weller talk 20:24, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Because I am being harassed, some people just follow my account to revert all of my edits, then report me for "edit warring".ArsenalAtletico2017 (talk) 20:40, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

At first I was confused about Doug's question here but now I see that ArsenalAtletico2017 made this edit and then thought better of it: [3]. I would also like to know what they meant by I know what's the real reason for that, although I would avoid mentioning it. ArsenalAtletico2017: were you suggesting that there is something suspicious about wanting to be careful not to rehabilitate the reputation a Nazi like Yockey? Are you aware that POV-pushing by Nazi apologists is a serious problem on Wikipedia about which the community is rightly concerned?

Regarding "harassment": have you already forgotten what I just said to you over on Llll5032's talk page? Our policy on harassment makes clear that Correct use of an editor's history includes (but is not limited to) fixing unambiguous errors or violations of Wikipedia policy, or correcting related problems on multiple articles. Your recent behavior demonstrates that problems related to Francis Parker Yockey are something which the community should be on the lookout for, and following your editing history is a totally legitimate way to do so. Generalrelative (talk) 20:48, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, I am not "suggesting" anything. The real reason, I think, is that you and other users want to force me out of Wikipedia and mask it as a "helping in improving articles". You claim that Wikipedia gives you right to engage in such activities, but I think you certainly are abusing your rights with a goal of artificially creating situations which will enable you and other users to report and potentially block me for "edit-warring" and force me out of Wikipedia. I personally think that your absurd accusations, like that one about me "personally attacking" another user while I was just referring to Wikipedia's rule, and the general pattern of such behavior further prove my point.

What do you mean by "Your recent behavior demonstrates that problems related to Francis Parker Yockey are something which the community should be on the lookout for, and following your editing history is a totally legitimate way to do so". Would you like to elaborate? ArsenalAtletico2017 (talk) 21:23, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean by "Your recent behavior demonstrates that problems related to Francis Parker Yockey are something which the community should be on the lookout for, and following your editing history is a totally legitimate way to do so". Would you like to elaborate? You have already been blocked for this behavior, so it should be unambiguous.

The real reason, I think, is that you and other users want to force me out of Wikipedia. Could it be perhaps instead that you have established a pattern of disruptive editing, and have responded to appropriate attention from the community with defensive hostility? I assure you that if you were to change this pattern right now, I and everyone else who has warned you above would be more than happy to never bother you again. Generalrelative (talk) 22:07, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relieved in fact. Doug Weller talk 10:18, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArsenalAtletico2017, are you editing Wikipedia with any different accounts now? Llll5032 (talk) 17:16, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

What you are doing now at Imperium: The Philosophy of History and Politics is a form of edit warring. I have reviewed and editing text you wrote and you have reverted my edits. That's not an effective way to get your way, nor is it consistent with our editing guidelines. Please desist from this behavior. Generalrelative (talk) 15:59, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Which edits are you specifically talking about? I have not reverted your edits.ArsenalAtletico2017 (talk) 16:00, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

All the edits you made immediately after I made mine have been attempts to finagle and roll back the spirit of my reverts. And now you're doing the same with FFF's reverts. Just stop obsessively jumping in and attempting to unilaterally control the tone of the article. Generalrelative (talk) 16:19, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That's very vague and uncertain claim, whatever it is supposed to mean. Which edits specifically have I reverted? ArsenalAtletico2017 (talk) 16:20, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Generalrelative (talk) 16:46, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 19:58, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ArsenalAtletico2017 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked indefinitely for edit-warring (which I was previously blocked for 24 and 31 hours) and personal attacks, which I guess consisted of calling another user "overtly hostile" to me and suggesting that they are using a sock puppet account. I think the measure applied is too harsh and I would like to ask admins to review the decision to reduce time or maybe unblock my account

Decline reason:

It's not too harsh. You are blocked until you can convince people you'll never again make personal attacks or engage in edit warring. Yamla (talk) 21:08, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ArsenalAtletico2017 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

For 5 years of my editing on Wikipedia, I have always tried to resort to civil dissolution of conflicts. I did not think that what I wrote could be taken by other users as insult, so It was not intentional. I don't have any particular interest to interact with those people or insult them, also I would like you to pay attention that I did not use any mean word or vulgar language. I do realize that insulting is not a proper way of communicating with other users on Wikipedia and I don't plan to insult other users in future. Additionally, I don't generally engage in edit warring. I was blocked for edit warring 2 years ago, and second time several weeks ago. I was not really trying to revert edits made by other users, It is just that the edits were made by many users simultaneously in real time so I somehow did not notice that I have changed the text in the same way more than 3 times. I generally do understand that edit-warring is not proper way of interacting with other users on Wikipedia, and I don't plan to engage in edit wars in future.

Decline reason:

Edit wars are not often planned, so I don't find "I don't plan to engage in edit wars" very convincing. I concur with Bbb23 in that you don't really understand what edit warring or personal attacks are. 331dot (talk) 06:22, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your unblock request demonstrates no understanding of what constitutes edit-warring or a personal attack. Your ignorance of policy - or what I suspect is actually sophistry - will prevent you from being unblocked. In addition, (almost) 5 years of editing is misleading as the number of edits you've made is not that high. Finally, you seem to like editing controversial articles and often with a POV that is not acceptable to other users; this will in and of itself create a WP:BATTLEGROUND scenario, which is not conducive to collaborative editing. I suggest you take at least six months to think about whether your style and approach are appropriate for editing on this project.--Bbb23 (talk) 21:59, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Second part of your comment really makes me think that I am blocked for ideological reasons. You say that I push certain POV and effectively accused me of being biased, not providing any proof, while not even assuming that maybe it is the other users who were pushing biased narrative (while there is plenty of evidence which backs my claim, particularly in case of those 3 users who were actively editing Imperium: The Philosophy of History and Politics article, and generally, leftist bias on Wikipedia has often been point of discussion). Anyway, I guess I won't be unblocked, but at least I know the real reason why and I am not really surprised. ArsenalAtletico2017 (talk) 22:15, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

((ec)) I did not accuse you of bias. I said that your POV is unacceptable to other users. Wikipedia works by consensus, and if an editor is constantly battling against consensus, they have a problem.--Bbb23 (talk) 22:19, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is very big difference between constantly battling against consensus of different users, on different articles, and battling against consensus of a particular group of 3 users at one particular article.ArsenalAtletico2017 (talk) 22:35, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ArsenalAtletico2017 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I thoroughly analyzed that my behavior was against rules of the Wikipedia. I will not repeat those mistakes. I wish to edit constructively again, without edit warring and personal attacks. I feel that block is no longer necessary because I understand what I was blocked for, I will not do it again, and I will make productive contributions instead. I also will not create any new sock puppet accounts, realizing that sock puppetry in and of itself destroys the Community's trust in the first place. I would try my best to not make any disruptive edits, and will focus my attention on making every edit good and productive, not disruptive. I understand that my behavior was wrong, but I hope I will be given a second chance. I value this community and plan to be a productive member of it.

Decline reason:

too late, you continued to evade your block by creating socks, no reason to think this won't continue. Doug Weller talk 08:31, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Doug Weller talk 08:25, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Doug Weller: Does that means that I can never get unbanned?ArsenalAtletico2017 (talk) 18:06, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your ping of Doug Weller didn't work because the template was malformed when you first signed the comment (see H:PINGFIX). You can still be unbanned, but your appeal needs to be at the administrators' noticeboard (not just an unblock template here). Your appeal is much more likely to succeed if you fit the qualifications for the "standard offer":

Wait at least six months, without sockpuppetry or block evasion; i.e. having made no edit, using any account or anonymously, on English Wikipedia.
Promise to avoid the behavior that led to the block/ban.
Don't give people reasons to object to your return.

Continued sockpuppetry is hurting your chances of having an appeal accepted by the community. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 14:00, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Firefangledfeathers Lol. He was socking just a few minutes before you posted. [4] He created that sock this morning after his last sock was blocked on the 12th. Doug Weller talk 14:09, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations opening soon

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are opening in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 1 September). A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:50, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election voting opening soon!

Voting for the upcoming project coordinator election opens in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 15 September) and will last through 23:59 on 28 September. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. Voting is conducted using simple approval voting and questions for the candidates are welcome. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:26, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Correction to previous election announcement

Just a quick correction to the prior message about the 2022 MILHIST coordinator election! I (Hog Farm) didn't proofread the message well enough and left out a link to the election page itself in this message. The voting will occur here; sorry about the need for a second message and the inadvertent omission from the prior one. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:40, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election voting closing soon

Voting for the upcoming project coordinator election closes soon, at 23:59 on 28 September. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. Voting is conducted using simple approval voting and questions for the candidates are welcome. The voting itself is occurring here If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:12, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2023 is now open!

Voting is now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2023! The the top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki . Cast your votes vote here and here respectively. Voting closes at 23:59 on 30 December 2023. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. Hawkeye7 (talk · contribs) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:55, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for coordinators is now open!

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:40, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for WikiProject Military history coordinators is now open!

Voting for WikiProject Military history coordinators is now open! A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. Register your vote here by 23:59 UTC on 29 September! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:33, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]