User talk:ArsalanNouri24

ANI

I removed the thread you placed at WP:ANI. It was an enormous mess. It was also completely atypical of a brand new user. What other accounts have you used at Wikipedia?--Bbb23 (talk) 13:04, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Removing a discussion on ANI is not a good behavior of an administrator, I have right to discuss on ANI and report the disruptions on Wikipedia and it’s not a violation, try to behave yourself I know you are a powerful user ArsalanNouri24 (talk) 13:19, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 13:25, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ArsalanNouri24 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, I opened a discussion on ANI about the the indian editors disruption and pov push on south asia articles, my report was not a simple report to accuse anyone or personal attack I hard worked the provide the full evidence but now the User:Bbb23 who is also an administrator removed my topic from ANI with no reason just pushing pov [1] and then a user repeatedly removed my topic on behalf of Bbb23 and accused me for a sock user, then the user Bbb23 abused his power on me and he banned me (Infinite block), you can check my account I don’t violated any term or policy and Wikipedia is for everyone

Decline reason:

Declined as per UTRS appeal #64405. Confirmed block evasion, no comment as to IP addresses. Yamla (talk) 13:53, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user is Possilikely (a mix between possible and likely), IranicaEditor. ArsalanNouri24, if you pull garbage like this again, expect to lose access to your talk page. You are not permitted to edit or remove declined unblock requests for your currently active block. --Yamla (talk) 13:59, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Using “garbage” word in front of a user is personal attack and uncivil behavior and also accusing me with linking to another editor are personal attack either too, Wikipedia is not property of any user, Everyone have right to use it and contribute ArsalanNouri24 (talk) 14:05, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You are confused. You have no right to edit Wikipedia. See WP:FREE. --Yamla (talk) 14:06, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Death threat

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Yamla (talk) 14:15, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #64405

is closed. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:43, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]