User talk:Arrsar11522

This is Arrsar11522's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Physics Wallah (PW) (May 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This appears to be a duplicate of another submission, Physics Wallah, which is also waiting to be reviewed. To save time we will consider the other submission and not this one.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Physics Wallah (PW) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Physics Wallah (PW), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 10:34, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Arrsar11522! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 10:34, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Physics Wallah (PW) (May 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Gusfriend were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Tone is promotional rather than neutral. References should be associated with text in the body of the article if possible.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Physics Wallah (PW) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Physics Wallah (PW), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gusfriend (talk) 07:28, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. SuperMarioMan (Talk) 20:17, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Arrsar11522 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

our account has been blocked on Wikipedia because our content was promotional rather neutral. We understand your concern that we can't use promotional tone while submitting an article on Wikipedia. As we had no idea about it so we just submit a normal article in the Wikipedia but now we will not use promotional tone and will keep the article neutral. We will also include all the reliable sources while submitting the article Arrsar11522 (talk) 11:26, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This doesn't even mention WP:SOCK once. Yamla (talk) 11:34, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This edit request to Template:Unblock/doc has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Arrsar11522 (talk) 09:42, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: please use the {{unblock}} to request an unblock, not {{edit semi-protected}}. 💜 melecie talk - 10:01, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Arrsar11522 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Thanks for your quick response. We have created the multiple account and we are getting sockpuppet issue because in our first account all the referral links were blacklisted but now we have many reliable sources because PhysicsWallah (PW) has become 101st unicorn of India. Also, when we were trying to upload any content in the previous account it was deleted again and again so we decided to create a new account and we are using only this account for submitting information on Wikipedia. We can delete that account if it is necessary to unban this account. Please guide us and let us know the information so that we can unban this account and can add our content on Wikipedia because it is very important that our company's information is available on Wikipedia page Arrsar11522 (talk) 12:24, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You keep using "we", "our", "us" etc in your unblock request. This is telling me this is a shared account, which is explicitly not allowed on Wikipedia. Also, if your sole reason to edit is to "share your company's information", then you need to look else as Wikipedia is not for promoting your company. RickinBaltimore (talk) 12:54, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please review Wikipedia:Notability (companies and organizations); your company isn't entitled to have a Wikipedia article simply because it exists. You must demonstrate that it is sufficiently notable for inclusion. Also, statements like "it is very important that our company's information is available on Wikipedia page" make it sound like your intention is to use Wikipedia for publicity. We have no interest in helping you publicize your company's existence; please see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 14:32, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]