User talk:Arrashju
WorKK
Created pages for Final Boss, Carbon and Str8 Rippin
Created outline page for Pro MLG Teams
Created MLG Pro Player pages for 2006 Final Boss, Carbon and Str8 Rippin (Ogre 2, Ogre 1, Walshy, Saiyan, Karma, Ghostayame, Gandhi, ShocKWav3, StrongSide, Tsquared, AYB Fonzi, Foulacy, Cpt Anarchy, Defy)
Created outline for Major League Gaming page
Demonstration of Impact on MLG Growth in 2006/2007
WorKK Founder of MLG on Wikipedia
[edit]WorKK
Created pages for Final Boss, Carbon and Str8 Rippin
Created outline page for Pro MLG Teams
Created MLG Pro Player pages for 2006 Final Boss, Carbon and Str8 Rippin (Ogre 2, Ogre 1, Walshy, Saiyan, Karma, Ghostayame, Gandhi, ShocKWav3, StrongSide, Tsquared, AYB Fonzi, Foulacy, Cpt Anarchy, Defy)
Created outline for Major League Gaming page
Demonstration of Impact on MLG Growth in 2006/2007
|
Speedy deletion nomination of Ben Jackson (electronic sports player)
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Ben Jackson (electronic sports player), requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
- It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Rileychilds (talk) 23:53, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
Image tagging for Image:Boost.gif
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Boost.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 19:05, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
License tagging for Image:MLG usa250-250.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:MLG usa250-250.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 20:07, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
Lots of little edits
[edit]Can I get you to read Help:Show preview before making any further edits? - 152.91.9.144 23:12, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
License tagging for Image:MLG3.JPG
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:MLG3.JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 04:10, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
Final Boss
[edit]The article Final Boss has been or soon will be deleted from Wikipedia. This happened because the article seems to be about a subject but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. You might also want to read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles. NawlinWiki 15:43, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
test
[edit]Thank you for experimenting with the page Tsquared on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Melaen 11:00, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles that you have created yourself. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please do the following:
- Place {{hangon}} on the page. Please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag(s).
- Make your case on the article's talk page.
Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. IrishGuy talk 11:12, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Dave "Walshy" Walsh, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from http://www.nzone.com/object/nzone_team3d_memberbios.html. As a copyright violation, Dave "Walshy" Walsh appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Dave "Walshy" Walsh has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If the source is a credible one, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source.
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on Talk:Dave "Walshy" Walsh. If the article has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at Dave "Walshy" Walsh, after describing the release on the talk page. However, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Prolog 12:11, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
The article Dan "Ogre 1" Ryan has been or soon will be deleted from Wikipedia. This happened because the article seems to be about a subject but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. You might also want to read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles. NawlinWiki 12:28, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
USA Network
[edit]You've posted a bunch of links in your gamer articles labeled "USA Network" but the link is to http://www.usa.com, which is a search engine that has nothing relevant. Fan-1967 04:33, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
Wikipedia 101
[edit]- Hi, I'm glad you joined Wikipedia, however I think you need to learn the basics of how to edit. I have been to a bunch of MLGs myself if you need help PM me on Wikipedia.
First: Be sure you write from a Neutral Point of View (WP:NPOV). Don't promote anything. You almost got the MLG article deleted. I had to fix everything.
Second: Be sure all your article are cited by multiple independent sources. (WP:Notability)
For example:
Orge are all them are apart of Final Boss which is a notable team itself therefore they should just be included in the Final Boss article, but unlike Ben Jackson and Tsquared I am not sure the members of Final Boss have achieve anything notable enough to deem their own articles. I think they should be combined.
Third: How to cite sources, add
<ref>[www.whateverwebpage.com The name of the source is]</ref> Then above the External links add ==References== <references/>
Fourth: Sign your posts by adding ~~~~ add the end of any post you make on a talk page (discussion page included).
Thats basically it!
On a side note: Please don't just removed categories from people. You can put people in more categories but dont just remove them. With that can you please add back [[Category:American electronic sports player]] to anyone you removed that from. Thanks. Valoem talk 02:22, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
- No problem!, one more thing you are going to need is adding photo licensing to all photos you upload otherwise they will be deleted. Assuming you work for MLG, and only if you work for them, you can added {{promophoto}} in the licensing section, then add the source of the license and add fair use rational (why this image is needed).
If you don't ask them on the forum, im sure they will allow it. Who are you on MLG forums btw?
To get to the licensing section click on the image, then next to License click edit and added the tag. If there is no licensing section just click on edit at the top of the page and add:
==License== {{promophoto}} or what ever license applies. Here is a list of all possible tags, WP:ICT.
Oh yea don't forget to sign your posts by adding ~~~~ after you are done talking on a talk page. Valoem talk 04:23, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
One more thing ...
[edit]Please don't move other articles into that: Category:Electronic sports competitors.
Why did you even create this category? Not only is Category:American electronic sports players and Category:Electronic sports teams better because it has been around longer hence more people are aware of it, but also it is much more informative. It determines what country the player is from, and whether or not it is a team. Your category Electronic sports competitors is probably going to be deleted so please don't move anything else into, you would be hurting your cause.
Secondly, when creating an article don't use Ben "Karma" Jackson etc., you are suppose to just use his proper name. This is the precedence as far as I am concerned so don't change it back. Also I "moved" your article not just clear edited it and covered it up with a redirect. Valoem talk 05:36, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
- No the ones that I tranferred over meet WP:NOTABILITY Valoem talk 04:51, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
AfD Notice
[edit]Hello. Just letting you know, you may be interested in this Articles for Deletion listing, which includes many of your articles. The main concern is that the players seem to fail Wikipedia's notability criteria. Gzkn 09:25, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
- Just for future reference: try to avoid editing redirect pages. Thanks! :: Colin Keigher (Talk) 19:44, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
- Even if they have been on USA Network, they still fail WP:BIO. :: Colin Keigher (Talk) 19:56, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
Personal attacks
[edit]Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. :: Colin Keigher (Talk) 21:23, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thanks for writing this article. Unfortunately it doesn't conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new articles. However, please do not be disheartened by what may happen to your first article, if indeed it is deleted. Please continue to edit Wikipedia and add articles which conform with the inclusion criteria. For help, see Help:Contents. To find out what will probably be deleted, see Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion and Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not. Thanks, and if you have any questions, please ask them on my user talk page. To do this, click on my name (just after this sentence) and click discussion at the top and then the (+) button at the top. thewinchester 19:03, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
AfD
[edit]You are not permitted to edit the beginning of the AfD like you did there. I will be relisting them individually later on. :: Colin Keigher (Talk) 20:40, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
Attacks
[edit]Even if you don't sign them, the bot picks them up:
- Comment OMG -- don't ever come with this AfD stuff unless you spend the time actually reading the articles because you are very being ignorant right now.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Arrashju (talk • contribs) 22:45, 23 December 2006.
By the by, I can read/scan a page in about 10/15 seconds, and these (with the exception of the 3 I reversed on, after notabliity was added) are all non-notable. So, I'm not being ignorant, just fast. And, learn to play nice. SkierRMH 11:20, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
E-gamers - what category is being used?
[edit]I'm not trying to PO people here, and this is a serious question from a non-sports person (the only sports I do are downhill skiing and figure skating (and a bit of college hockey years ago))... What criteria is being used for these people? My reading of the WP:BIO is along these lines...
From Wikipedia:Notability (people) Where do e-gamers fall into the standard categories? They are not:
- Political figures
- local political figures
- entertainment or opinion makers
- actors or TV Personalities
- Published authors, editors and photographers
- Painters, sculptors, architects, engineers, and other professionals
- Persons achieving renown or notoriety for their involvement in newsworthy events, such as by being assassinated
Can they be considered under the following:?
- Sportspeople/athletes/competitors who have played in a fully professional league, or a competition of equivalent standing in a non-league sport such as swimming, or at the highest level in mainly amateur sports or other competitive activities that are themselves considered notable, including college sports in the United States.
They aren't sportspeople or athletes - but they may be competitors; is this the category where their notability is being justified? I didn't think that this was the intent of this category; I read this as those that are actually physically competing. If e-athletes are to be judged under this criteria, I would urge a notation being made as such to prevent further confusion on the issue.
As I couldn't put them in any of the above categories, I fell back to the basic:
- "The person made a widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record in their specific field. - All of these criteria are in fact simply special cases of the general primary criterion of multiple non-trivial published works from independent sources. A person who is "part of the enduring historical record" will have been written about, in depth, independently in multiple history books on that field, by historians.
There may be articles written about these people, to whom I have no animosity, but can it be said that they are making a widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record in their specific field?
I do agree that several of the persons on the AFD list do have independent notability, and have noted so on their pages. However when looking at the field, I still say that these don't qualify as I don't see how they are part of the enduring historical record... (article - began playing):
- Chris Smith (electronic sports player) - May 2005
- Scott Lussier - July 2005
- Eric Hewitt - April 2006
- Ben Jackson (electronic sports player) - May 2005
- Dave Walsh - March 2004
- Brandon Jenkins - April 2006
- Carlos Morales (electronic sports player) - April 2006
- Michael Cavanaugh - April 2006
- Victor de Leon III - "Victor has won no tournaments and has no notable placements in professional events."
- Ryan Danford - May 2004
- Zyos -"Leto quit gaming professionally after his former team, Xit Woundz, failed to place top 4 during the second event of the 2006 season."
- TuLegit - ?
Again, I'm not trying to PO people here, would just like to see a clarification made for future disucssion on where exactly these people fit into the WP:BIO scheme!
Thanks for your patience with a non-gamer. :) SkierRMH 05:58, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. :: Colin Keigher (Talk) 22:24, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
- What does me being white have to do with this? :: Colin Keigher (Talk) 20:05, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
MLG
[edit]Hi, you edited Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Team Carbon after it was already closed, which you're not supposed to. Nonetheless, I will answer here. The subjects are nna per the reasons I already gave in the addition before.
Looking for input
[edit]Hey there. Not too long ago, you were involved in the AfDs centering around Major League Gaming. I would appreciate some input as I believe there needs to be some sort of consensus on whether or not the notability of these players meets requirements for Wikipedia. Thanks. :: Colin Keigher (Talk) 04:52, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
Your edits to Eric Hewitt
[edit]Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, Arrashju! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but please note that the link you added in is on my spam blacklist and should not be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links policy for more information. If the link was to an Imageshack or Photobucket image, please read Wikipedia's image tutorial on how to use a more appropriate method to insert the image into an article. If your link was genuine spam, please note that inserting spam into Wikipedia is against policy. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 07:07, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
Please stop adding inappropriate links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming and will be removed. Thanks. Shadowbot 07:09, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
Please stop spamming Wikipedia. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing. Shadowbot 07:09, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you insert a spam link, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Shadowbot 07:10, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
MLG Edits
[edit]Hi, you have done a lot of edits that are all tied to MLG-related articles. Edits are of course appreciated, but as a probable MLG employee, fan or affiliate please be cautious of producing advertisements, POV-articles and/or fancruft. Wikipedia is not the place for this. MLG comprises only a minor part of e-Sports world-wide, so putting a lot of emphasis on MLG in e-Sports articles is obviously the wrong way to go and will only result in repetitive deletion. Instead, please consider contributing to broader aspects of e-Sports. There are numerous teams and players listed on 2006 e-Sports World Champions that would require an article in order to present a balanced world view in the e-Sports category. Any help in creating and editing these is appreciated. Thanks -- DJiTH 18:17, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned fair use image (Image:EmblemShockwave.jpg)
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:EmblemShockwave.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 11:49, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
){kind=link}
Orphaned fair use image (Image:EmblemFonzi.jpg)
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:EmblemFonzi.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 11:49, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
){kind=link}
Orphaned fair use image (Image:TeamCarbon.PNG)
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:TeamCarbon.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 11:50, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
){kind=link}
Orphaned fair use image (Image:OgreTwin2.PNG)
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:OgreTwin2.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 11:50, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
){kind=link}
Orphaned fair use image (Image:OgreTwin.PNG)
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:OgreTwin.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 11:51, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
){kind=link}
Orphaned fair use image (Image:TeamCarbon.JPG)
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:TeamCarbon.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 11:51, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
){kind=link}
Orphaned fair use image (Image:Carbon.PNG)
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Carbon.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 12:45, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
){kind=link}
Orphaned fair use image (Image:Coach.PNG)
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Coach.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 16:02, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
){kind=link}
Orphaned fair use image (Image:Strategist.jpg)
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Strategist.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 16:06, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
){kind=link}
Orphaned fair use image (Image:Best sniper.jpg)
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Best sniper.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 16:07, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
){kind=link}
Community fellowship sda church
[edit]The article Community fellowship sda church has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.
Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki 14:56, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
Individual churches generally do not meet Wikipedia's standards of notability. Please don't repost this article unless you can show, by reliable sources, that this church is notable in some way. Thanks, NawlinWiki 14:59, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, the external links you added do not comply with our guidelines for external links. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. IrishGuy talk 02:41, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:Ghostayame.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Ghostayame.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:05, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:Shockwav3.jpg
[edit]
Thank you for uploading Image:Shockwav3.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 21:13, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:Fonzi.jpg
[edit]Thank you for uploading Image:Fonzi.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:39, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned fair use image (Image:Close range.PNG)
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Close range.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 04:36, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
){kind=link}
Orphaned fair use image (Image:Battle rifle.jpg)
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Battle rifle.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 20:52, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
){kind=link}
Orphaned fair use image (Image:1v1.jpg)
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:1v1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 07:05, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
){kind=link}
Image copyright problem with Image:Ogre1.jpg
[edit]Thank you for uploading Image:Ogre1.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Longhair\talk 08:53, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Sabra.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Sabra.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 19:41, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
Copyright concerns
[edit]Your account has been blocked due to copyright concerns. For general instructions regarding image uploads, please review Wikipedia:Uploading images, as well as Wikipedia:Fromowner if you are the copyright holder. Thank you, Can't sleep, clown will eat me 23:06, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Anarchy Avatar.gif
[edit]
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Anarchy Avatar.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 00:02, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Support.PNG
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Support.PNG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:38, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Unpredictable.PNG
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Unpredictable.PNG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:15, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Power weapon.PNG
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Power weapon.PNG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:20, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:Tsquared.jpg
[edit]Thank you for uploading Image:Tsquared.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.
Image copyright problem with Image:CptAnarchy.jpg
[edit]Thank you for uploading Image:CptAnarchy.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. 84.103.60.153 (talk) 15:36, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:EmblemTsquared.jpg)
[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:EmblemTsquared.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 04:52, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
){kind=link}
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:EmblemSaiyan.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:EmblemSaiyan.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it may be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 13:43, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
Image:Carbon.gif
[edit]I have tagged Image:Carbon.gif as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 21:18, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
Image copyright problem
[edit]Thanks for your uploads. You've indicated that the following images are being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why they meet Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page an image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check
- That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
- That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --12:12, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:EmblemStrongside.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:EmblemStrongside.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ZooFari 03:40, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Str8Rippin.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Str8Rippin.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ZooFari 03:40, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
File permission problem with File:TeamCarbon.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:TeamCarbon.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.
If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
- make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
- Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en
wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en
wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:06, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
File copyright problem with File:TeamStr8Rippin.jpg
[edit]
Thank you for uploading File:TeamStr8Rippin.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:36, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
Nomination of Final Boss (electronic sports team) for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Final Boss (electronic sports team) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Final Boss (electronic sports team) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 20:47, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
Nomination of Michael Cavanaugh (electronic sports player) for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michael Cavanaugh (electronic sports player) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Cavanaugh (electronic sports player) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Ridernyc (talk) 08:43, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
Nomination of Ryan Danford for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ryan Danford is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ryan Danford (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Ridernyc (talk) 08:44, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
Nomination of Eric Hewitt for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Eric Hewitt is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eric Hewitt (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Ridernyc (talk) 08:48, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
Nomination of Ben Jackson (electronic sports player) for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ben Jackson (electronic sports player) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ben Jackson (electronic sports player) (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Ridernyc (talk) 08:50, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
The article Ben Jackson (electronic sports player) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Appears to be primarily first person research and very opinionated
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rileychilds (talk) 23:05, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Ben Jackson (electronic sports player)
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Ben Jackson (electronic sports player), requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
- It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Rileychilds (talk) 23:13, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
The article Ben Jackson (electronic sports player) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- very opinionated and biased
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rileychilds (talk) 18:51, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:EmblemSaiyan.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:EmblemSaiyan.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. The1337gamer (talk) 12:48, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
Nomination of Cpt Anarchy for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cpt Anarchy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cpt Anarchy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hugsyrup 16:06, 9 January 2020 (UTC)