Jump to content

User talk:Arosa045/sandbox

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

hello world welcome

A lot of information in the first section is based on a page from the American College of Orgonomy. I had a hard time telling if this study was peer reviewed. Also, there was no citation for the section describing what orgonite was compromised of. Are all crystals that you can buy in the store composed the same way? Also, I'd be interested to see why certain crystals are classified as they are.

In the second section, the statement, "Orgonite has a different effect on everybody" is not backed up with a citation. A lot of the information about the crystal's frequencies is not backed up in relation to the crystal, but rather relation to cell phone towers and other things emitting energy. I think that this section needs to prove that the crystals emit said energy before proving what the energy can do.

Peer-review

[edit]
I noticed some grammar issues, such as run-on sentences and incomplete statements. In addition, try not to use the pronoun “you” as this is meant to be for an online encyclopedia. Also, be careful with what you say or what sources you use, so it does not come off as medical or mental health material (one of your sources was a psychology journal). I think you should also look for one more academic peer-reviewed source because 1/3 of your sources is just a regular online blog article (Natural Society) written by a writer/speaker/entrepreneur. Otherwise, your article might get taken down. Mariaalmutawa (talk) 22:27, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]