User talk:Arnitxe

Welcome!

Hello, Arnitxe, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Arnoutf (talk) 13:20, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to Europe

Hello, I'm Masssly. Thank you for your contribution. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Europe, but unfortunately you didn't provide a reliable source and so I had to remove it for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Kind Regards...—Sadat (Masssly)❤Talk☮C☺Email☯

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. Such edits are considered vandalism and quickly undone. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. Subtropical-man talk
(en-2) 12:28, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Potential superpowers, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Fezzerof^{(talk)/(contribs)} 12:32, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Potential superpowers. OccultZone (Talk) 13:08, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been mentioned on this talk page. OccultZone (Talk) 13:18, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop editing content back in after others have taken it out (reverted in jargon). If your edits are removed soon after you added them there are almost always good reasons for the removal. The way forward in such cases to open a discussion on the talk page of the article you tried to edit and figure out how to come to a generally supported edit (or lack thereof). Putting the edits back in is considered disruptive and may lead to warnings (like those above), and to blocking of your account. Arnoutf (talk) 13:20, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Potential superpowers shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 21:24, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.

June 2014

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at Potential superpowers. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Bbb23 (talk) 01:16, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

Stop removing "United States" from Potential superpower, you may want to reconsider your last block. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 11:28, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Still June and still making non-constructive edits at Superpower and Potential Superpowers! Why? Antiochus the Great (talk) 12:03, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Stop making unconstructive, unsourced claims on Superpower and Potential Superpowers. Continued disruptive editing can get you blocked. Arnoutf (talk) 19:22, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Europe. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Robert McClenon (talk) 19:04, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Superpowers, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. User appears to be WP:NOTHERE. Continues to vandalize and edit war on same articles after block expired. EvergreenFir (talk) 03:21, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

Your addition to Europe has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Favonian (talk) 12:16, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Original Research Notice

Notice of No Original Research Noticeboard discussion

Hello, Arnitxe. This message is being sent to inform you that a discussion is taking place at Wikipedia:No original research/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 14:07, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Daniel Case (talk) 14:23, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Acroterion (talk) 02:31, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your use of multiple accounts

Read WP:SOCK Login to your User:Mediolanum‎ account and post an unblock request, you need to promise no more socking or legal threats to be taken seriously. Any comments you post to the talk page of PS will be reverted on sight, sockpuppets do not have the privilege of editing. Supersaiyen312 (talk) 10:12, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]