User talk:ArnieSchoenberg

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Hilda Kuper. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. In particular, please replace broken links to external sources with working links - using the WayBack Machine if necessary - in preference to simply deleting them. Thanks again, zazpot (talk) 20:34, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Vancouver Model has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Vancouver Model. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 02:12, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vancouver Model (August 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by OlifanofmrTennant was:

Far too short and 3/5 citations are from the same guy

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vancouver Model and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

OLI 23:23, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ArnieSchoenberg! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! OLI 23:23, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Links to draft articles

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Adjunct professors in North America. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 12:24, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I've seen links to drafts on other wikipedia pages ArnieSchoenberg (talk) 00:20, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vancouver Model (February 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by The Herald were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Need more inline citations and references to establish notability and to meet SIGCOV.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vancouver Model and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

The Herald (Benison) (talk) 07:01, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Vancouver Model

Hello, ArnieSchoenberg. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Vancouver Model, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:05, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Vancouver Model

Hello, ArnieSchoenberg. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Vancouver Model".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:50, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]