User talk:Arndisdunja

Hi! :) Now you should get a nice brown banner up on the next Wikipedia page you open, telling you that you a new message. I'm glad you finally decided to get an account, I've always thought you'd make a model Wikipedian :) - Haukur Þorgeirsson 21:22, 31 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I'd like to wish you a very warm welcome to Wikipedia! — Matt Crypto 22:44, 31 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Matt! I must admit though, that I fear for the state of our household now... Whoever will do the housework if both of us will be sitting paralyzed in front of the computer, refreshing our watchlists?! ;) Arndisdunja 23:06, 31. October 2005.

LOL! I knew there must have been a reason why I hadn't introduced my wife to Wikipedia yet...! — Matt Crypto 17:52, 1 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the Wikipedia

I noticed you were new, and wanted to share some links I thought useful:

For more information click here. You can sign your name by typing 4 tildes, like this: ~~~~.

Be bold!

I am especialy glad to greet the wife of such a fine contributer as your husband, who wrote Lóðurr, a wikipedia article I was bragging about just minutes ago to a critic of our encyclopedia. Glad to have you, Sam Spade 23:26, 31 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I see you have already discovered British playwrights since 1950, and I agree that Wikipedia is awfully lagging behind as far as contemporary British drama is concerned. I hope you'll find enough time to add what you know in this field. Welcome on board. <K F> 22:56, 2 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Arnaldur

Sorry, I just couldn't resist when I saw the news on mbl. Funnily, it also mentioned that Ian Flemming won the steel dagger, but they have fixed it now. Anyway, thanks for adding the title. Stefán Ingi (talk) 17:09, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

:Þ Arndisdunja 17:42, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The Yule Lads

I am glad to see that you posted an article on The Yule Lads. I had been thinking of writing that article myself. However we need to move it to Yule Lads if you have no objection. By normal Wikipedia naming convention we do not use "the" in the title of an article unless "the" is actually part of the proper name, such as The New York Times. I would like to see the article expanded to include a description of each of the lads and what each one does.

I have added the categories Category:Nordic folklore and Category:Christmas characters to the article. I am not sure about the category Category:Elves. Are the lads considered to be elves?

I am interested in the lads because I spent two years in Iceland, '95–'97 and enjoyed it very much. There is a group of us here in California who were in Iceland at that time, and each year we celebrate the lads coming down from the mountains. Today we saw Stúfur on his way down. I would also like to see pictures of each of the lads if we can find some non-copyrighted pictures. •DanMS 19:55, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. I also added a link to the Icelandic Wikipedia [[is:Jólasveinn]]. If there is a similar entry in the other languages, you could add a similar link to those Wikipedias. •DanMS 20:32, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Cassandra Claire

Takk, þú ert best :) - Haukur 22:22, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Haukur's Rfa

I plead for forgiveness, good Lady. You may execute me for it... but only after the event is concluded. ;) → P.MacUidhir (t) (c) 21:00, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Three weeks of admin tools

Today three weeks have passed since I was granted access to the administrator toolbox. During this time I have made use of it in the following way:

Protections and unprotections: 1
Blocks and unblocks: 4
Deletions and restorations: 69
Rollbacks: 246

I've found that the rollback tool is much more useful than I'd thought for vandalism patrol. In fact it makes that task so easy that I've been doing it more than before. On the other hand I've been surprised by how little the blocking tool is needed. Having done a significant amount of vandalism patrol I have still only blocked one solitary vandal. The great majority of addresses which send out a vandal edit do so only once. Those who do it more often usually stop after a warning or two. Only rarely is a block actually needed and in those cases someone usually beats me to it.

As a side note I haven't retired from writing articles either. I'm still hoping to bring Freyr up to featured status but even though I've already performed more edits on it than on Hrafnkels saga back in the day, a lot of work remains to be done. Community expectations for featured articles have gone up and so have my own ambitions. I'm currently waiting for a couple of books I ordered to arrive and then I may be able to make the final push.

I'm trying my best to live up to the trust you showed in me by supporting my RFA. If ever you feel uncertain whether I'm using the admin tools in the best interests of the project, let me know. I am at any time willing to relinquish the mop and reapply for it to address concerns people have and ensure that I'm not using the admin tools without being trusted to do so. Haukur 22:39, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have to note (with amusement) that this is a somewhat unusual way to address your wife, Haukur ;-) Have you been accused of "blatantly abusing your powers" (or variations) yet? That's when you know you're truly a seasoned admin... — Matt Crypto 23:14, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

*blush* You've got a point there, Matt. Didn't want to leave her out but the template I wrote doesn't quite fit :) I'm hardly seasoned yet and I don't think I've got any accusations! I've got to start deleting fair-use images or something :) Haukur 23:26, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reykjavik Pond

I just love that photo of the Reykjavik pond, oh how I long for Iceland. Thanks for putting it online. Brenton.eccles 07:27, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Arndisdunja! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 51 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Fredrik Skagen - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 21:54, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Candace Fleming.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Lugia2453 (talk) 21:31, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Candace Fleming concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Candace Fleming, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 15:16, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Candace Fleming

Hello Arndisdunja. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled Candace Fleming.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Candace Fleming}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 05:00, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Candace Fleming

Candace Fleming, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:04, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]