User talk:Arla

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Arla, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Cirt (talk) 16:25, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ohio county

Can you check fi:Loganin piirikunta (Ohio)? Nyttend (talk) 16:32, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Seems fine to me. I shall expand it soon.Arla (talk) 17:04, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I simply took the Mahoning County article that you created and copy/pasted data to get the Logan County article: thus the bit about Bellefontaine that you had to fix. Nyttend (talk) 12:38, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Today's featured article

I saw that today's Finnish featured article is Marsalkka Mannerheimin ratsastajapatsas (Helsinki), which has an impressive picture of the statue at the top. Can you tell me whether the license is similar to any of the ones English uses? Nyttend (talk) 12:38, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's fair use so you can use it in articles directly related to the statue of marshal Mannerheim. Any other use is forbidden.

Another counties thing

I don't know if you've noticed, but many Ohio counties have pictures of their courthouses on Commons. Does fi:wikipedia have a policy about using pictures, whether supporting it or opposing it, in contexts such as the picture of the Morgan County courthouse on that article? Nyttend (talk) 13:13, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It is recommended to have at least one picture per article. Yes, I have planned adding pics later.--Arla (talk) 17:53, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations for finishing all 88 counties! Nyttend (talk) 13:39, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Since you say that it's good to have at least one picture, I'm adding some pictures. Could you fix the captions if I make mistakes? Nyttend (talk) 13:42, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

LGF

I was trying to work on a compromise, to include what was factual (written by someone who was obviously pretty upset, likely a new CFJ victim) while removing what obviously didn't fit BIO policy. Please don't be a knee-jerk revert type. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.197.10.222 (talk) 16:08, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please cite sources and make sure you are not biased in favor of other side. --Arla (talk) 16:12, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Finnish language sources

Hello. Could you please take a look at Talk:Badoo#Spam_2. There has been a discussion for a long time about the website Badoo and whether or not it is a spam site. There has not been a source found for over a year to support the claim until now. An editor has found a finnish newspaper that may have credible information. Would you be willing to take a look at the proposed sources and offer suggestions to improving the article?--v/r - T P 01:48, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I never got around to thank you for reviewing the source. I appreciate you taking the time to read it and make a few changes.--v/r - T P 01:10, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Translator needed

Hi Arla, I've found you via WP:Translation. Could you please have a look at Hobitit and the equivalent at fi.wikipedia? I've managed to extract some list data from the Finnish version but help with the prose text would be appreciated. So if you could spare some time please try to expand the English article with some translated text. De728631 (talk) 20:55, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Arla. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Arla. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Arla. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Arla. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Disappearance of Raisa Räisänen for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Disappearance of Raisa Räisänen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Disappearance of Raisa Räisänen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 01:54, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

History of Kherson request on WikiProject Ukraine

Hi there, the redirect to Kherson seems to work. Does anything else need to be done with regard to your request? Amitchell125 (talk) 12:53, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I was asking help to split the history into main article.--Arla (talk) 09:54, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I suggest you go to Template:Split section and follow the instructions there. Regards, Amitchell125 (talk) 15:08, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Arla. Thank you for your work on Rise of the Runelords. Bastun, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hi Arla, nice work on your new article. Just to note, there were several instances where the definite article, "the", was omitted - I've fixed those now. Just something to watch for the future.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Bastun}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 15:12, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Bastun: Thanks for help. My English isn't perfect so assistance is always welcome.--Arla (talk) 17:26, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Starfinder Pact Worlds (March 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Guessitsavis was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of books). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please give us a little bit more about the book and its contents.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Starfinder Pact Worlds and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sincerely, Guessitsavis (she/they) (Talk) 16:42, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Arla! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sincerely, Guessitsavis (she/they) (Talk) 16:42, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! Thank you for contributing articles on more recent RPG supplements. :) One advantage for topics published within the last decade or so is that there has been increasing coverage online in reliable sources. If you get a chance, please look for more sources for this book and try resubmitting! Hopefully you can get it published. :) BOZ (talk) 20:04, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

RPG supplements

Hi there! :) If you are interested in starting more articles on RPG supplements and adventures, I have many reviews listed at User:BOZ/RPG reviews noticeboard that you can feel free to use as a starting point. :) BOZ (talk) 19:12, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi :) More articles will follow, I'm sure of that. I'm wondering is it better to name articles e.g. Armory (Starfinder) instead of Starfinder Armory as first option is aligns better with D&D articles. What do you think? --Arla (talk) 14:09, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's best to go with the actual title of the book, and if you need disambiguation then add the parenthetical note. So if the book for example is actually titled "Starfinder Armory" then you would use Starfinder Armory, but if the book is simply titled "Armory" then you would use Armory (Starfinder). If you have a more unique title that does not require disambiguation (such as "Mordenkainen's Tome of Foes") then you can just use that name as the title of the article. BOZ (talk) 15:31, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also I'm curious about Category:Role-playing game supplements by year -categories, which are currently not in the year-categories where they should be. Since these may have articles on dice sets and GM screens, would it be better to place them in works-categories rather than books? --Arla (talk) 13:28, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Horror Adventures moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Horror Adventures. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and a link to a blog and the publisher's website is not sufficient sourcing. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:34, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]