User talk:Arjunkl777

Welcome!

Hello, Arjunkl777, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as ResearchFox Consulting, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Cahk (talk) 07:55, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of ResearchFox Consulting

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on ResearchFox Consulting, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Cahk (talk) 07:55, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of ResearchFox Consulting

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on ResearchFox Consulting, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 08:27, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

October 2016

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. BethNaught (talk) 08:29, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Arjunkl777 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your I was not knowing what to add and what not to, I will correct my style of writing, my only motive is to list our company name in wikipedia thats it Arjunkl777 (talk) 08:48, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Wikipedia is not a company directory, and it only carries articles about companies that satisfy the notability requirements described at WP:NCORP - and having done a bit of searching, I don't think your company satisfies those requirements so I think it is unlikely you would be blocked to write about it. Additionally, individuals with connections to companies are bound by Wikipedia's conflict of interest rules (explained at WP:COI) and are strongly discouraged from writing about them. If there's anything else you want to write about at Wikipedia, please let us know in a new unblock request. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:19, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Arjunkl777 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

No no you took me wrong my intention is not list my company as company directory, just like how other peer companies are listed even we want our company to appear in wikipedia page of Market Research companies in India, please allow me to write my article Arjunkl777 (talk) 10:30, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

"ResearchFox provides niche market research services which go beyond client - vendor transactions/ interactions by not only paving way for strong relationships but also creating a healthy ecosystem for actionable decision making with focus on delivering high quality research services to business professionals, organizations and individuals through knowledge driven research methodology" If this is what you think passes for neutral encyclopedia articles, clearly there's no point in unblocking you. If you can take the time to read and explain WP:COI, WP:PROMO, and WP:SPAM, can explain your understanding of them and why your edits were inappropriate, and promise to refrain from writing about ResearchFox, we'd be willing to consider another unblock request. Yamla (talk) 11:01, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{{unblock}}

OK, since you won't be writing about ResearchFox Consulting, what do you expect to write about? The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 15:03, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Arjunkl777 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Mr James, as I told you earlier from my side I will not be writing anything about ResearchFox. However, I will rarely use edit if I come across anything misrepresented. Also, you can use my service for anything other purpose which will contribute positively to Wikipedia. Cheers!!Arjunkl777 (talk) 06:08, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

I've unblocked. PhilKnight (talk) 00:30, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@BethNaught:- would you object to an unblock? PhilKnight (talk) 22:37, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@PhilKnight:, I would go ahead and unblock as BethNaught has edited without commenting and the appeal meets WP:GAB.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:22, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit reversion

In this edit here, I reverted some information that appears to be a violation of our copyright policy.

I provided a brief summary of the problem in the edit summary, which should be visible just below my name. You can also click on the "view history" tab in the article to see the recent history of the article. This should be an edit with my name, and a parenthetical comment explaining why your edit was reverted. If that information is not sufficient to explain the situation, please ask.S Philbrick (Talk) 11:51, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]